Why Do Provisionists Support The Calvinist View So Often?

1. Responsibility
2. Culpability
3. Causation

You're conflating 3 terms.
We are culpable for our sin but we're not the ultimate cause of sin.

"You will say to me then, why does He still find fault, for who has resisted His will?"
Paul had heard your argument before and addressed it.
Sorry, but you err and provide no support for your claim.

God is not the cause of your sin, you are.

1 Corinthians 10:13 (ESV) — 13 No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.
 
Last edited:
More fabrication

I was not involved in the creation and God was not involved in causing my sin or yours

Hence, no co-creator
You claimed your the ultimate cause of your sin. God is the ultimate cause of, not all things, as the Bible says, but most things as you claim. Hence you claimed to be a co-creator.
 
You claimed your the ultimate cause of your sin. God is the ultimate cause of, not all things, as the Bible says, but most things as you claim. Hence you claimed to be a co-creator.
My sin was not a part of the original creation,

so you equivocate and attempt to blame God for your sin
 
Sorry, but you err and provide no support for your claim.

God is not the cause of your sin, you are.
Right on queue, you're denying the fall again.
Pelagian

Even you admit we have a sin nature which guarantees we will sin.
You admit it's because of Adam breaking the Edenic covenant.
You admit we were given this sin nature by God.
Your doctrine conflicts with itself.

Adam is culpable for our sin nature
We are culpable for our sins.
But culpability is not causation
Doesn't seem fair but Paul addressed it here ?

"You will say to me then, why does He still find fault for who has resisted His will?"
 
Right on queue, you're denying the fall again.
Pelagian

Even you admit we have a sin nature which guarantees we will sin.
You admit it's because of Adam breaking the Edenic covenant.
You admit we were given this sin nature by God.
Your doctrine conflicts with itself.

Adam is culpable for our sin nature
We are culpable for our sins.
But culpability is not causation
Doesn't seem fair but Paul addressed it here ?

"You will say to me then, why does He still find fault for who has resisted His will?"
Sorry no, I affirm Adam freely fell, so you fabricate

Your theology makes God the author and cause of the fall
 
Were you a "part of the original creation"?

Did you "originate" your own existance later?

Nonsense tom.

Nope

God had set up the process by which man could propagate his species.

It was not a special act of creation ex Nihilo.
 
@Reformedguy @Howie @CookedGoose

Nope

God had set up the process by which man could propagate his species.

It was not a special act of creation ex Nihilo.

?So fltom's claim is that God did not create fltom ...

No wonder he believes he sits on the other side of the chessboard from God.

Colossians 1:16 For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.

Fltom does not Transcend "all things created".

John 1:3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

...
 
Sorry, but you err and provide no support for your claim.

God is not the cause of your sin, you are.

1 Corinthians 10:13 (ESV) — 13 No temptation has overtaken you that is not common to man. God is faithful, and he will not let you be tempted beyond your ability, but with the temptation he will also provide the way of escape, that you may be able to endure it.
That verse is a non sequitur regarding sin in the world
 
Of course, it is

According to Calvinism all that happens is because God decreed it and assures its happening.
So nonsensical

If you murder someone
You're sent to prison for life
You would "blame" the judge, (using your logic)
Because the judge is the cause of you being there
Even though you were culpable for the sin.

Obviously causation and culpability are separate issues.
 
@Reformedguy @Howie @CookedGoose



?So fltom's claim is that God did not create fltom ...

No wonder he believes he sits on the other side of the chessboard from God.

Colossians 1:16 For by him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or rulers or authorities—all things were created through him and for him.

Fltom does not Transcend "all things created".

John 1:3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made.

...
See Ps 139:13-14. Tom is unaware of the majority of scripture.
 
Sorry no, I affirm Adam freely fell, so you fabricate

Your theology makes God the author and cause of the fall
We also freely fall
And we were given a sin nature.
Compatible.

Your doctrine can't deal with this
So you deny the fall until you get called out on it
Then you'll equivocate and claim you acknowledge the fall.
It's a doctrine that conflicts with itself.
 
Were you a "part of the original creation"?

Did you "originate" your own existance later?

Nonsense tom.

Nope

God had set up the process by which man could propagate his species.

It was not a special act of creation ex Nihilo.

All of creation is THE ORIGINAL creation... including you tom.

Deism is heresy.

See Ps 139:13-14. Tom is unaware of the majority of scripture.

Exactly:
Psalms 139:13 For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

...
 
All of creation is THE ORIGINAL creation... including you tom.

Deism is heresy.



Exactly:
Psalms 139:13 For you formed my inward parts; you knitted me together in my mother's womb.

...
Sorry I was not created EX Nihilo nor were you

Do you not hold to traducianism?

It would then be your heresy.
 
Back
Top