You are under the misconception that Christians don't follow the law. The ten commandments are taught all through the New Testament. In the prophets for the most part when God corrected His people He listed their moral failings, not neglect in keeping ordinances. What is more important to God is that we love one another which is what the law is all about.
Tell me when the new covenant is instigated.
Do you keep the Jerusalem council laws in Acts 15? What about the Sabbath? Do you keep that? Are you okay with homosexuality? Etc.?
Tell me if the new covenant in Jeremiah 31:31-34 says you're in there.
Then all your previous Rabbi's who obviously are not knowledgeable according to you are wrong.
The Rabbi's gave several opinions. You haven't shown that what I've said is wrong in the light of all their sayings.
That wasn't the question. You're squirming. When did Jesus apply his blood at the altar at the temple in Jerusalem according to the law?
Actually, yes, I don't eat with the blood and I rest on Saturday, celebrate the Lord's resurrection on the Lord's day, Sunday. I'm not okay with homosexuality, as are most Christians unless they are apostate. God also commanded for us to be generous to the poor, that's a biggie. One of the major reasons Israel went into captivity was because of her mis-treatment of the poor. Today that would also include the Palestinians.
You're supposed to celebrate the Sabbath. Why don't you do that? The Sabbath was made for man.
So more than 10 laws.
Wrong. It had to do with the Sabbatical years. Palestinians are treated better in Israel than in Gaza under their own leadership. Get real. And, there is no such thing as a Palestinian. It's made up. The majority are from Jordan.
You still don't get it. The altar was for animal sacrifices, not the Messiah's who was ordained to replace them. His sacrifice was instigating the change from the Old Covenant to the New one. It would not be on the altar of animal sacrifice. That is why God destroyed the second temple. He was putting an end to a system that He was rendering obsolete. It was only intended as a foreshadow to prepare people for the last sacrifice of Messiah Isaiah 53. His soul was made an offering for sin.
Then why bring up Leviticus 17 as support for blood atonement?
If this was true sacrifices wouldn't have continued for 36 years.
Wrong, see above.
The Sabbath was a day of rest, people did not leave their tents. That is the purpose of the Sabbath, physical refreshment. The Sabbath is also a foreshadow of the rest we have in Jesus. We rest from our own efforts to obtain our salvation which is provided for us by God.
This is false because Jesus went to the synagogues on the Sabbath, cured, etc.
So, you don't keep it as Jesus did. Got it.
God has never changed the requirement for the necessity for blood atonement for the removal of sin, He only removed the temple because it was no longer needed. The reference in Jeremiah takes place before the Babylonian captivity and is referring to the sacrifices that would resume when the second temple was built before its destruction in 7O AD.
How was Daniel atoned for during his exile?
False because:
False. See above.
Exodus 16:29, 30 See, for that the LORD has given you the Sabbath, therefore He gives you on the sixth day the bread of two days; you abide every man in his place, let no man go out of his place o the seventh day. So the people rested on the seventh day.
I answered the Daniel question in another post. Go find it, it's lengthy and I'm not going to repeat it here.
If they weren't to leave their tents, were would they go to the bathroom?
Then Jesus broke the original purpose of the Sabbath and is a sinner. Got it.
You are killing, actually murdering the scriptural explanation of the Messiah's coming and purpose. That's very sad.
Give me a link. Why are you afraid? Hope in a Messiah is not an atonement.
Nope. It says never fail.
You're referencing the Rabbi's and can't find support of your arguments.