The AV defenders today generally are well aware of the fact that the AV represents Greek and Latin preservation, and some important verses are not Greek Majority.
You provide no documented evidence that supports your opinion. D. A. Waite is a well-known and leading AV defender. Do you claim that the books by D. A. Waite are not available to discuss today?
D. A. Waite asserted that “the Textus Receptus is based on over 5,210 Greek manuscripts or over 99% of those preserved for us” and that “the Textus Receptus manuscripts are almost perfect mirrors of one another” (
Central Seminary Refuted, pp. 67, 80, 95). D. A. Waite claimed that “the Textus Receptus is from a type of text known as the Traditional Text” (
Fundamentalist Distortions, p. 27), that “the Textus Receptus kind of text is represented by over 99% of the 5, 255 manuscripts” (p. 52), and that “the Textus Receptus is based on over 99% (over 5,210) of the Greek manuscripts extant today” (p. 53). D. A. Waite wrote: “The Textus Receptus manuscripts vary in spellings somewhat. Let them vary” (
BJU’s Errors, p. 43). D. A. Waite contended that “the ‘
Textus Receptus’ was the result of the agreement of thousands of Greek manuscripts” (
Critical Answer to Michael Sproul’s, p. 132). Waite claimed: “Each of these manuscripts of the Traditional Text or Received Greek Text are virtually identical” (
Foes of the KJB, p. 130).