Reformedguy
Well-known member
Post ignored.What part of the text does not say do you not understand
What part of you do not ignore plain texts of scripture to speculate on what it does not say do you not understand?
Ezekiel 18:20 (KJV 1900) — 20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
Ezekiel 18:1–4 (ESV) — 1 The word of the LORD came to me: 2 “What do you mean by repeating this proverb concerning the land of Israel, ‘The fathers have eaten sour grapes, and the children’s teeth are set on edge’? 3 As I live, declares the Lord GOD, this proverb shall no more be used by you in Israel. 4 Behold, all souls are mine; the soul of the father as well as the soul of the son is mine: the soul who sins shall die.
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) — 16 “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
2 Kings 14:6 (ESV) — 6 But he did not put to death the children of the murderers, according to what is written in the Book of the Law of Moses, where the LORD commanded, “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. But each one shall die for his own sin.”
2 Chronicles 25:4 (ESV) — 4 But he did not put their children to death, according to what is written in the Law, in the Book of Moses, where the LORD commanded, “Fathers shall not die because of their children, nor children die because of their fathers, but each one shall die for his own sin.”
You constantly reject what the scriptures say to speculate about what scripture does not say
Nowhere does the text state the infants were guilty of the crimes of thei parents
Nowhere does it say the infant were punished for the sins of their fathers
rather than believe what the scriptures state you he look for reasons to disbelieve
Tom has failed to do deal with 1 Samuel 15 where innocent children are killed for another's transgression.
Big font is not a arguement. Big font is a lame attempt at distraction.