Calvinism, The Only View That Can Consistently Justify The Omni-Attributes of God With Scripture and Logic!

The power of libertarian free will and the range of it is God's idea and creation. But God has omni-prerogative over it. We are not pantheistically God as is your philosophy and neither is our libertarian choice.
How. “free” is your will really ? You can only choose from what God has made available to you with the nature God designed for you
 
LOL RG never addresses scripture rebuttal and imagines the one posting rebuttal has to answer his own rebuttal

Still question begging incompatiblism
 
Still question begging incompatiblism
All RG does is deny the evidence


He probably does not understand what compatibilism entails either.
 
All RG does is deny the evidence


He probably does not understand what compatibilism entails either.
Still question begging incompatiblism
 
Still question begging incompatiblism
Rather, you show you do not know what compatibilism is

 
Rather, you show you do not know what compatibilism is

No? What is it?
 
How. “free” is your will really ? You can only choose from what God has made available to you with the nature God designed for you

That is true. We can't think or do what doesn't occur to us or what we literally can't do. But you are correct, we do have limited libertarian free will in what God has made available to us.
 
No. LOL. You have no clue.
Compatibilism was refuted here


which is why you do not deal with it

Seeing as all you do is dodge

Compatibilism is the idea that determinism and free will are compatible

In compatibilism God determines your desires, and you do what those determined desires cause you to do

If however God is not involved in an act then it is not a case of compatibilism

which is why the scriptures posted are contrary to compatibilism,
 
Compatibilism was refuted here


which is why you do not deal with it

Seeing as all you do is dodge

Compatibilism is the idea that determinism and free will are compatible

In compatibilism God determines your desires, and you do what those determined desires cause you to do

If however God is not involved in an act then it is not a case of compatibilism

which is why the scriptures posted are contrary to compatibilism,
If God is not involved then it's not compatiblism? Your question begging incompatiblism.

Not to mention the Bible has numerous instances where compatiblism is the only logical conclusion. Acts 4, David numbering Israel and so on. In fact the Bible itself is a prime example of compatibilism. The best part? My position does not need to question beg.
 
If God is not involved then it's not compatiblism? Your question begging incompatiblism.

Not to mention the Bible has numerous instances where compatiblism is the only logical conclusion. Acts 4, David numbering Israel and so on. In fact the Bible itself is a prime example of compatibilism. The best part? My position does not need to question beg.
You have no clue what you are talking about.

If God is not involved in an act, how can he be determining it.

You were given multiple examples where God was not involved

In Calvinist theology, God determines everything

If all things are not determined because God was not involved in the act compatibilism does not exist in that act

and Calvinist theology that all things are determined is an error.
 
You have no clue what you are talking about.

If God is not involved in an act, how can he be determining it.

You were given multiple examples where God was not involved

In Calvinist theology, God determines everything

If all things are not determined because God was not involved in the act compatibilism does not exist in that act

and Calvinist theology that all things are determined is an error.
God does not have to be involved in a event for it to be determined. Once again tom is presupposes his position.

Who says involvement is necessary for something to be determined?
 
God does not have to be involved in a event for it to be determined. Once again tom is presupposes his position.

Who says involvement is necessary for something to be determined?

So history moves by itself without God 's input? Sounds more like libertarianism.
 
God does not have to be involved in a event for it to be determined. Once again tom is presupposes his position.

Who says involvement is necessary for something to be determined?
That is absurd. If he determined it, he is involved.

How does he make his determination a reality if he is not involved?

Your comments make no sense.
 
Back
Top