What activity of God ?Oh that would be The Consubstantial Logos/Son taking upon Himself this flesh, these bones, and this blood ,by way of the virgin.
Catholics are no different from any other religious denomination, just different laws as all of these has among themselves for a belief for a god. They are not christian they are chaholic, LDS, Mormons, Baptists, Methodists, AOGs, you name in instead of Christian.
You shouldn’t be basing doctrinal belief on a textual variant.
A difficult passage and connected with much of a controversy, for different mss say differently, some ὁς (who), some - the majority - θεός (God); the last reading is confirmed also by ancient theologians such as Ignatius of Antioch, who c. 107 AD seems to allude to the 1 Timothy 3:16 in saying in his letter to Ephesians: εις ιατρος εστιν, σαρκικος και πνευματικος, γεννητος και αγεννητος, εν σαρκι γενομενος θεος (one is the Physician, both fleshly and Spiritual, begotten and unbegotten, God who came to be in flesh (Eph. 7:2), and again: θεου ανθρωπινως φανερουμενου - "God manifested humanly" (ibid. 19:3). (hermeneutics.stackexchange)
He, The God of v. 15, was manifested in the flesh.
The subject of verse 15 (and the chapter) is the CHURCH…..not God.
εὐσεβείας εὐσέβειαeusebeia
Dumb. Completely ignores the context of the first 15 verses.
If GOD was the legit reading in this verse, it would’ve been the go-to verse (along with 1 John 5:7) during the trinitarian controversies around the 4th century. With those two verses, in fact, there would’ve been no controversy at all. Yet we don’t see that, do we?
The verses emphasizes the significance of the church as a pillar of truth and highlights the mystery of godliness revealed through God manifested in the flesh the Word made flesh Jesus Christ.
More stupidity.
Wow!
So the AI you’re led by must have nothing intelligent to say about the meaning of godliness, eh?
Another meltdown!