You seem to be having a reading difficulty
I stated nothing about skipping over those verses.
Theo stated
No, you are the one with the reading difficulty.
I never claimed you "stated" that you skipped over anything.
I correctly observed that you DID skip over it.
"Skipping" denotes an action, not an assertion.
And regardless of whether you claimed to skip it or not skip it, your ACTIONS denoted that you DID skip it.
And this is one of the reasons why interacting with you is so incredibly distasteful.
sorry I skipped nothing but questioned why you stopped short of Paul's summary statement
and noted your interpretation is contrary to it
You did nothing to dispel that fact
i just noted it cannot contradict Paul's summary statement
And Paul summary statement shows the Jew's problem was not unconditional election to conversion but a lack of faith and a desire to establish their own self-righteousness.
Theo stated
So here's the thing...
First of all, Paul's "summary statement" made absolutely NO mention of "unconditional election", to be able to deny it.
Wake up Theo
He noted Israel problem was a lack of faith and a desire to establish their own righteousness
Theo
Secondly, you are trying to pit Scripture against Scripture. You are trying to appeal to Rom. 9:30ff to try to claim that Rom. 9:11-24 is false. Now you will never admit that, of course, but that is precisely what you are doing.
Sorry you are very confused
i never stated Rom 9:11-24 is false
Rom 9:11-24 is true
your interpretation of it however is false
Theo stated
You are trying to interpret Rom. 9:30ff WITHOUT first addressing Rom. 9:11-24, but the fact of the matter is that Paul wrote 11-24 PRIOR to 30ff, and that means is that he expected his readers to read 11-24 BEFORE reading 30ff, which you refuse to do.
again the Issue was your failure to include Rom 9:30FF
It contradicts your interpretation of Rom 9:11-24
I have interpreted Rom 9:11-24 many times so you make another false claim
Theo
You want to project a meaning onto 30ff that contradicts what Paul already wrote, which is why you don't want to address 9:11-24 until AFTER you have projected your false theology onto 30ff.
sorry Theo Rom 9:30 is quite plain in its meaning and you have done nothing at all to show i falsely interpreted it
and is confirmed in both Rom 10 and 11
Romans 10:16–21 (ESV) — 16 But they have not all obeyed the gospel. For Isaiah says, “Lord, who has believed what he has heard from us?” 17 So faith comes from hearing, and hearing through the word of Christ. 18 But I ask, have they not heard? Indeed they have, for “Their voice has gone out to all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.” 19 But I ask, did Israel not understand? First Moses says, “I will make you jealous of those who are not a nation; with a foolish nation I will make you angry.” 20 Then Isaiah is so bold as to say, “I have been found by those who did not seek me; I have shown myself to those who did not ask for me.” 21 But of Israel he says, “
All day long I have held out my hands to a disobedient and contrary people.”
Romans 11:20–23 (ESV) — 20 That is true.
They were broken off because of their unbelief, but you stand fast through faith. So do not become proud, but fear. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, neither will he spare you. 22 Note then the kindness and the severity of God: severity toward those who have fallen, but God’s kindness to you, provided you continue in his kindness. Otherwise you too will be cut off. 23
And even they, if they do not continue in their unbelief, will be grafted in, for God has the power to graft them in again.
Unconditional election and reprobation of eternal destinies is clearly unbiblical