CrowCross
Well-known member
What's the protection factor of your mask?Nope. I'm just fine... as are others who have the sense to wear masks. Your comment only further displays your ignorance and lack of factual information regarding the topic.
What's the protection factor of your mask?Nope. I'm just fine... as are others who have the sense to wear masks. Your comment only further displays your ignorance and lack of factual information regarding the topic.
Better than zero... which is the factor that anti-maskers have.What's the protection factor of your mask?
Your answer showed me you no nothing. You should have googled it first and learned what it meant.Better than zero... which is the factor that anti-maskers have.
He knows that a mask offers some protection, so your claim is false.Your answer showed me you no nothing. You should have googled it first and learned what it meant.
You should have used a term that wasn't vague to the point of nonsense.You should have googled it first and learned what it meant.
Define "some". Blocking 0.000000000001 % of the virus would be considered as some.He knows that a mask offers some protection, so your claim is false.
Protection factor isn't a vague term.....unless you have a Biden like memory as we have discussed it here several times.You should have used a term that wasn't vague to the point of nonsense.
Yes.Protection factor isn't a vague term
Mask and protection go hand in hand.Yes.
It is.
Without context, the term is meaningless...
Neither do you; the term is meaningless.Mask and protection go hand in hand.
You see, this is why you think masks work...as you don't have a clue as to what a protection factor is.
As I said...you don't understand the two terms...but you insist masks work.Neither do you; the term is meaningless.
You could debunk this claim by showing where it's defined - and it better be somewhere that the average person can look at and say "Oh, right, that's not arbitrary at all"...
I understand both. Together, they're meaningless.As I said...you don't understand the two terms
Ha! You actually proved me wrong for once. Good for you; I retract my accusation. It's an obscure standard - but it's still a standard that I didn't think you had reasonable access to. I was wrong.I've wrote about it several times on this forum. Here. Educate your self.
You don't know what "some" means? Do you not have access to a dictionary?Define "some". Blocking 0.000000000001 % of the virus would be considered as some.
I know a lot more than you. That's why I got vaccinated. After reading your posts your claims of "knowledge" are laughable.Your answer showed me you no nothing. You should have googled it first and learned what it meant.
I was actually just about to post a thread on this news.
I was actually just about to post a thread on this news.
No, I think this works, I wasn't even aware there had been a thread on the Guidestones going onThat would be fine.
Please do so.