Go see "Sound of Freedom"

The problem is that this movie distorts the real problem of child sex abuse, which overwhelmingly occurs with family members or friends, and less often by strangers abducting children to far away places. The result is that attention is diverted from where it is needed most.
 
The problem is that this movie distorts the real problem of child sex abuse, which overwhelmingly occurs with family members or friends, and less often by strangers abducting children to far away places. The result is that attention is diverted from where it is needed most.
It's actually increasing the danger and making children less safe. It is also very creepy. It's not so much about paedophiles as for them. I can see lots of people enjoying it for very wrong reasons. A dystopian fantasy, unrelated to the planet we actually live on.
 
The problem is that this movie distorts the real problem of child sex abuse, which overwhelmingly occurs with family members or friends, and less often by strangers abducting children to far away places. The result is that attention is diverted from where it is needed most.
The child sex trafficking trade is inceasing and this film highlights and exposes it.
That child sex abuse also goes on in the home doesnt mean we shouldnt have trafficking exposed as well.

The biggest new increase in child abuse is trans ideology. Many friends and family have had their children indoctrinated to thinking they should harm themselves if they dont get accepted for what they aren't.
 
It's actually increasing the danger and making children less safe. It is also very creepy. It's not so much about paedophiles as for them. I can see lots of people enjoying it for very wrong reasons. A dystopian fantasy, unrelated to the planet we actually live on.
Isnt it unsurprising that those who support transgender child sex abuse are not in favour of a film that exposes child sex trafficking.
 
The problem is that this movie distorts the real problem of child sex abuse, which overwhelmingly occurs with family members or friends, and less often by strangers abducting children to far away places. The result is that attention is diverted from where it is needed most.
The problem is the distorted views alright.
Its a bit like this:
Your argument like, investigating rapes and burglaries distracts West Yorkshire Police from the more important work of falsely arresting, assaulting and kidnapping autistic teenage girls and arresting old women for taking photographs of stickers.
Naah
 
The child sex trafficking trade is inceasing and this film highlights and exposes it.
That child sex abuse also goes on in the home doesnt mean we shouldnt have trafficking exposed as well.
It is more that abuse in the home while staying at home. It is about child sex trafficking. Less than 10% of child sex trafficking cases involve kidnapping. The 90% that this film ignores are cases where the victims know and trust their traffickers. By focusing on the 10% that involve adduction by strangers, and even the fact that the story is about foreign traffickers, that feeds into the narrative of America First vs. all those bad guys elsewhere. We don't like to face the fact that we grow our own traffickers right here - 90% of them in fact. But that movie would not sell. So it had to be spiced up by setting the bad guys as Columbians. All this misdirected fervor helps to hide the bulk of the problem of child sex trafficking and does a great disservice to those real children to whom this is happening.
 
It is more that abuse in the home while staying at home.
What are you trying to say here?
It is about child sex trafficking.
Yes, that is correct, the film is about that.

Less than 10% of child sex trafficking cases involve kidnapping.
You should provide some evidence for that, despite it being irrelevant to the film exposing child sex trafficking
The 90% that this film ignores are cases where the victims know and trust their traffickers.
Irrelevant
By focusing on the 10% that involve adduction by strangers, and even the fact that the story is about foreign traffickers, .
Focusing on 10% is a good thing. Perhaps we need another film to focus on the 90%
that feeds into the narrative of America First vs. all those bad guys elsewhere
Ok, no problem there, its child sex trafficking that it exposes

We don't like to face the fact that we grow our own traffickers right here - 90% of them in fact. But that movie would not sell. So it had to be spiced up by setting the bad guys as Columbians.
The movie as it is is has had enough trouble selling, and if Columbia and the US is at fault all the better for exposing that.

All this misdirected fervor
Its not misdirected, child sex trafficking is a serious issue
helps to hide the bulk of the problem of child sex trafficking and does a great disservice to those real children to whom this is happening.
Go and watch Barbie then

The hiding of transgender ideology child sex abuse is another issue closer to home, never mind the Columbians
 
Back
Top