christ_undivided
Well-known member
There is zero evidence for that claim. Zero. It is total conjecture based largely upon a less to more argument. Which ironically, is contrary to what everyone seems to accept here.I was under the impression that Mark was early, and possibly the first written Gospel.
Mark abandoned the faith and caused Paul to separate from Barnabas. The idea he wrote his work years before Luke is ridiculous to me.
Anyone care to make the argument for Marcan priority?
If the Truth be known, there are many such false claims that very few people challenge any more.
There is meaning difference between the so called Synoptic Gospels. Seriously, think for a moment. Who would of thought that multiple people detailing the historical narrative of Jesus Christ would of said similar things? That is what good witnesses do. They all have the common narrative called truth.
Luke said very clearly that MANY had taken to task to set forth an orderly account. I believe Luke. He wasn't just talking about Mark and Matthew.