CookedGoose
Well-known member
Even children?That is absurd everyone is guilty of their own sins
Again, think before you post Tom
Even children?That is absurd everyone is guilty of their own sins
Don't avoid the pointEven children?
Again, think before you post Tom
Think before you post Tom
If your theory were true
all fathers would be innocent.
If everyone is guilty of their own sinsDon't avoid the point
you absurdly came up with the statement
If children are innocent because they're not guilty of the father's sinof their son's sins, of their father's sins
not their own sins hello
you put your foot inn your mouth
Everyone is guilty of their own sinsIf everyone is guilty of their own sins
Wouldn't that include children?
If children are innocent because they're not guilty of the father's sin
then
Fathers are innocent because they're not guilty of the son's sin.
Either that or you've taken Mosaic law WAY out of context.
No. It's proves the truth of God's statement that we are all, BY NATURE children of [God's] wrath." Eph 2:3.The Provisionist and the Pelagians teach infants are born in a state if innocence.
In 1 Samuel 15 we see God sending Saul to destroy Amalek and the Egyptians. "Destroy all that they have" which included "woman, child and infants". We're these innocent newborns God was ordering to be killed?
Says nothing at all about being born guilty of Adams sinNo. It's proves the truth of God's statement that we are all, BY NATURE children of [God's] wrath." Eph 2:3.
Good. You believe the infants were killed for their own sin. ?Just like scripture which you ignore
Jeremiah 19:3–5 (ESV) — 3 You shall say, ‘Hear the word of the LORD, O kings of Judah and inhabitants of Jerusalem. Thus says the LORD of hosts, the God of Israel: Behold, I am bringing such disaster upon this place that the ears of everyone who hears of it will tingle. 4 Because the people have forsaken me and have profaned this place by making offerings in it to other gods whom neither they nor their fathers nor the kings of Judah have known; and because they have filled this place with the blood of innocents, 5 and have built the high places of Baal to burn their sons in the fire as burnt offerings to Baal, which I did not command or decree, nor did it come into my mind—
but also
Ezekiel 18:20 (KJV 1900) — 20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
No one is guilty of Adam's sin
And that is held by Arminians, Restorationists, Greek orthodox as well as provisionists
And you have no verse which states otherwise
Quote meGood. You believe the infants were killed for their own sin. ?
Whose sin is it infants are guilty of?Says nothing at all about being born guilty of Adams sin
Eze 18:20 which you quote above, with boldingQuote me
Ezekiel 18:20 (KJV 1900) — 20 The soul that sinneth, it shall die. The son shall not bear the iniquity of the father, neither shall the father bear the iniquity of the son: the righteousness of the righteous shall be upon him, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon him.
No one is guilty of Adam's sin
And?Eze 18:20 which you quote above, with bolding
?You really do need to stop reading your thoughts into everything you read.
Gotcha ...And?
That does not say the infants were killed because of their own sin
I'm correcting your misunderstanding of scriptureYou really do need to stop reading your thoughts into everything you read.
Pot....pot....... ?
You failed to show that scripture shows they were being punishedGotcha ...
What it says is, infants will not be punished for their fathers' sins; therefore it is their own sin for which they are being punished
I'm correcting your misunderstanding of scripture
You CANNOT PROVE the contrary.You failed to show that scripture shows they were being punished
You can't prove that either. ^^Why is it the Calvinist here are reading into scripture what it does not say?
scripture shows this refuting your theologyYou CANNOT PROVE the contrary.
You can't prove that either. ^^
I'm pretty sure God knew what that heinous culture would make of those children and infants and it was better for the infant to be with the LORD than in the hands of wickedness.The Provisionist and the Pelagians teach infants are born in a state if innocence.
In 1 Samuel 15 we see God sending Saul to destroy Amalek and the Egyptians. "Destroy all that they have" which included "woman, child and infants". We're these innocent newborns God was ordering to be killed?
??scripture shows this refuting your theology
Deuteronomy 24:16 (ESV) — 16 “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. Each one shall be put to death for his own sin.
2 Kings 14:6 (ESV) — 6 But he did not put to death the children of the murderers, according to what is written in the Book of the Law of Moses, where the LORD commanded, “Fathers shall not be put to death because of their children, nor shall children be put to death because of their fathers. But each one shall die for his own sin.”
2 Chronicles 25:4 (ESV) — 4 But he did not put their children to death, according to what is written in the Law, in the Book of Moses, where the LORD commanded, “Fathers shall not die because of their children, nor children die because of their fathers, but each one shall die for his own sin.”
Ezekiel 18:20 (ESV) — 20 The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not suffer for the iniquity of the father, nor the father suffer for the iniquity of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.
The Calvinist here day after day show they do not believe scripture
I agree, and it's not the issue.I'm pretty sure God knew what that heinous culture would make of those children and infants and it was better for the infant to be with the LORD than in the hands of wickedness.