James Keith Elliott actually missed some of the most important historical information.
Dr. Elliott missed nothing of relevance.
Incidentally, James White actually quoted from Farrer when he wiped the floor with Chris Pinto in that debate, but I see even that had no effect on your position.
Thus, your objection has no merit.
He wrote to me on Feb 21, 2018.
So?
"Hey, Mr. No Moon Landing, I wasn't aware of an irrelevant book from 75 years ago by a non-scholar that proves nothing, but thank you for wasting my time by bringing it to my attention."
And I have a page with the title.
"why the James Keith Elliott book tells you very little about Sinaiticus authenticity"
Folks, Avery is terrified you will actually read Elliott because it exposes the smoke and mirrors that is the modern Alpeh fake folks. Twenty years ago, the same thing was said by other posters about James White.
What these folks are terrified of is that since none of them can produce anything other than quote people, they're terrified you're going to quote White (back then) or Elliott (now) and debunk their nonsense for the uninitiated. So to keep that from happening, they attempt to discredit those folks.
As a reminder, Steven Avery wants you to discredit Keith Elliott because he didn't include an irrelevant citation - but he himself concluded the moon landing is fake without interviewing Buzz Aldrin, who has actually been.
It would seem to me since Aldrin is still alive (and lives not far from Avery) that he should have done this given he wants to impugn Elliott for not knowing about a resource in the primitive research days of 40 years ago when there was no quick online search mechanism.
Seems to me like Avery doesn't have any problem at all with exclusion just so long as he's the one not actually checking sources.