That response is so juvenileNot me.
That response is so juvenileNot me.
He reminds me of this:That response is so juvenile
The KJVO has no concept that they can make mistakes. He has been given examples of the flaws of his thinking and he pretends they do not exist.He reminds me of this:
And meanwhile, back in Sombertown...
Burgermeister: Stop! You are under arrest!
Kris Kringle: Not me!
Topper the penguin sidekick: Honk! Honk!
You mean new versions proponents have no concept that they can make mistakes.The KJVO has no concept that they can make mistakes. He has been given examples of the flaws of his thinking and he pretends they do not exist.
Give evidence of any people who have worked of new translations that claim that.You mean new versions proponents have no concept that they can make mistakes.
So name all the errors in the NIV, NASB, ESV, and the NKJV.Give evidence of any people who have worked of new translations that claim that.
Changing the subjectSo name all the errors in the NIV, NASB, ESV, and the NKJV.
They do not claim that they cannot make mistakes so your attempt to knock down a straw man proves nothing.You mean new versions proponents have no concept that they can make mistakes.
So name at least 10 errors in the NIV, NASB, ESV, and the NKJV.They do not claim that they cannot make mistakes so your attempt to knock down a straw man proves nothing.
You are trying to divert away from the truth that KJV-only advocates try to suggest that their human, non-scriptural KJV-only reasoning/teaching cannot be wrong or mistaken when it can be. KJV-only advocates repeatedly try to read human opinions into verses that do not actually state those opinions. You show that you try to read KJV-only ideas into verses that are not actually stated in those verses.
Would it sway you if 10 errors in the KJV were named?So name at least 10 errors in the NIV, NASB, ESV, and the NKJV.
Please try and prove that there are errors.Would it sway you if 10 errors in the KJV were named?
Why do you divert? I have not recommended the Critical Text or English translations made from it such as the NIV, NASB, and ESV.So name at least 10 errors in the NIV, NASB, ESV, and the NKJV.
So what version or versions do you recommend for an English speaking person?Why do you divert? I have not recommended the Critical Text or English translations made from it such as the NIV, NASB, and ESV.
According to your own demand, are you going to likewise name at least 10 errors in the KJV?
Diversion, diversion, diversionSo what version or versions do you recommend for an English speaking person?
Which version or versions do you use?
Which versions or versions does your church, denomination or teachers that you follow use?
Not me.Diversion, diversion, diversion
Many errors in the KJV have been pointed out to you. Because you're KJVO, you deny that they exist.Please try and prove that there are errors.
Actually there were only a few and I have shown that they are not errors.Many errors in the KJV have been pointed out to you. Because you're KJVO, you deny that they exist.
With you, it would be an exercise in futility.Actually there were only a few and I have shown that they are not errors.
I have done this over the years with many atheist evolutionists and other non believers.
The Muslims claim that there are man.
There are many resources available on the Internet that I can use.
But please prove any errors in the King James Bible.
Why not post your best 10.
Yes youNot me.
Where in the world today are the words of Christ that do not pass away?
Where in the world today are the words of Christ that do not pass away?Yes you