Nice. You can see the effect of the exposure as the stars a little elongated, but the James Webb is not (I don't think), so must be tracking the telescope.
Nice. You can see the effect of the exposure as the stars a little elongated, but the James Webb is not (I don't think), so must be tracking the telescope.
3 ) Comet Leonard - Thailand ( one hour exposure of the dust trail toward the camera ) Orbital period: 80,055 years
Credit & Copyright: Matipon Tangmatitham (NARIT) National Astronomical Research Institute of Thailand
Date: 2021 December 25
From: Thailand (reuse allowed)
Blue tail - ion trajectory away from the sun via the solar wind
If memory serves, radio and the James Webb (infra red) will look right through such clouds like there are not even there.6 ) Molecular cloud
View attachment 2659
Image credit: 8.2-meter VLT Antu, ESO, FORS Team
"Explanation: Where did all the stars go? What used to be considered a hole in the sky is now known to astronomers as a dark molecular cloud. Here, a high concentration of dust and molecular gas absorb practically all the visible light emitted from background stars. The eerily dark surroundings help make the interiors of molecular clouds some of the coldest and most isolated places in the universe. One of the most notable of these dark absorption nebulae is a cloud toward the constellation Ophiuchus known as Barnard 68, pictured above. That no stars are visible in the center indicates that Barnard 68 is relatively nearby, with measurements placing it about 500 light-years away and half a light-year across. It is not known exactly how molecular clouds like Barnard 68 form, but it is known that these clouds are themselves likely places for new stars to form. It is possible to look right through the cloud in infrared light."
___
Reference: Astronomy Picture of the Day
If memory serves, radio and the James Webb (infra red) will look right through such clouds like there are not even there.
Sometimes expressed as "stretches it like a tent." Hard for me to see how even a believer would read that as a description of continuous expansion; it seems rather to be a description of pulling something to make it fit over something else (presumably the earth). If instead the Bible had said something like "the stars flee from us, in every direction," that would have been impressive.•God is stretching the universe: (Job 9:8; Ps. 104:2; Is. 42:5; Jer. 10:12; Jer. 51:15; Zech. 12:1)
Sometimes expressed as "stretches it like a tent." Hard for me to see how even a believer would read that as a description of continuous expansion; it seems rather to be a description of pulling something to make it fit over something else (presumably the earth). If instead the Bible had said something like "the stars flee from us, in every direction," that would have been impressive.
Consider the fact that for hundreds of years before Hubble (the man or the telescope) there were astronomers who were devout Christians, who would have wanted to understand the Creation, and who would have been happy to use any hint from the Bible to do so. As far as I know, not one of them read any of these passages as a description of an expanding cosmos.