The Social Teaching of the RCC?

S

Southsider071

Well-known member
I was reading that the Magesterium is concerned about Mr. Milei who is running for the Argentine Presidency, even though Milei is against abortion and his opponents are in favor. They have pointed out that Milei's platform is inconsistent with Catholic Social Teaching.

From what I've seen, Mr. Milei is just a regular conservative fellow with a perm.

What is the Social Teaching of the RCC that Catholics are expected to follow.
 
Ric said:
Bingo!
Click to expand...

Bingo isn't as popular in the RCC as a social activity in recent years- at least in locations with legal casinos. Degenerate gamblers prefer the quicker fix of dropping their nickel into the slot and pulling the lever, knowing instantly whether they won or lost. Waiting for someone to call out dozens of numbers just takes too long.
 
Southsider071 said:
Bingo isn't as popular in the RCC as a social activity in recent years- at least in locations with legal casinos. Degenerate gamblers prefer the quicker fix of dropping their nickel into the slot and pulling the lever, knowing instantly whether they won or lost. Waiting for someone to call out dozens of numbers just takes too long.
Click to expand...
Yesteryears, in the church basement.
 
Southsider071 said:
I was reading that the Magesterium is concerned about Mr. Milei who is running for the Argentine Presidency, even though Milei is against abortion and his opponents are in favor. They have pointed out that Milei's platform is inconsistent with Catholic Social Teaching.

From what I've seen, Mr. Milei is just a regular conservative fellow with a perm.

What is the Social Teaching of the RCC that Catholics are expected to follow.
Click to expand...
The Social Teaching of the RCC that Catholics are expected to follow is what Christ taught: care and concern for the poor.

The left tends to exaggerate some aspects of Catholic Social Teaching in order to morally justify supporting pro-abortion candidates. I think, however, the left in the RCC is pro-abortion. Their sanctimonious, infernal whining about a "Consistent Life Ethic" is nothing more than an attempt to masquerade as pro-life and Catholic while supporting abortion.

That said----

Democrats argue that while they are pro-abortion, their policies on poverty lead to a reduction of abortion. They argue that while Republicans are pro-life, the number of abortions increase under Republican leadership.

Can a Catholic in such a scenario in good conscience vote for the Democrat? I personally would not vote for a pro-abortion candidate for office, but I think Catholics could in good conscience vote for a pro-abortion candidate--if they really believe the above.

The sin, then, is not necessarily in voting for the pro-abortion candidate. A Catholic sins--if they vote for the pro-abortion candidate---becasue they are pro-abortion.
 
Last edited:
Southsider071 said:
I was reading that the Magesterium is concerned about Mr. Milei who is running for the Argentine Presidency, even though Milei is against abortion and his opponents are in favor. They have pointed out that Milei's platform is inconsistent with Catholic Social Teaching.

From what I've seen, Mr. Milei is just a regular conservative fellow with a perm.

What is the Social Teaching of the RCC that Catholics are expected to follow.
Click to expand...
The social teaching of the Vatican II sect is essentially Marxist. You are not to commit any environmental crimes such as using plastic drinking straws or running the air conditioning too low.

You must accept the idea of wealth redistribution from the wealthy to the "marginalized."

You must wholeheartedly accept the LGBTQ/sodomite/pedophile/child genital mutilation agenda.

You must endorse the unrestricted migration of people of a different ethnicity, religion, and culture into European countries to the destruction of their culture, heritage, national sovereignty, and religion.

Most of all, you must be tolerant of any religion and of any belief, with the exception of Catholicism. That is the one thing that cannot be tolerated.
 
Southsider071 said:
I was reading that the Magesterium is concerned about Mr. Milei who is running for the Argentine Presidency, even though Milei is against abortion and his opponents are in favor. They have pointed out that Milei's platform is inconsistent with Catholic Social Teaching.

From what I've seen, Mr. Milei is just a regular conservative fellow with a perm.

What is the Social Teaching of the RCC that Catholics are expected to follow.
Click to expand...
The coming antichrist and the beast system.
 
Atemi said:
Like most Catholics, you do not believe killing babies in the womb is murder.
Click to expand...
I absolutely believe that killing babies in the womb is murder.

Nor, by the way, do I ever vote for pro-abortion (pro-infanticide) politicians. The only time I would is if I had no choice--that is---the candidates running for office all support murder. In such a case, there is no one I could vote for who was anti-murder. However I suppose in such a case I would opt for the lesser of the evils.
Atemi said:
Would it be a sin to vote for a pro murder candidate?
Click to expand...
Those who would vote for a pro-murder candidate argue that the murder (abortion) rate goes down under pro-abortion presidents, while it goes up under anti-abortion presidents. They argue that this is becasue pro-abortion presidents support abortion, but they also support policies that help single mothers so that they would be less likely to have an abortion.

What if you vote for the pro-murder candidate becasue in doing so, you believe the murder rate will go down?

I do not buy that myself and I never vote for pro-murder candidates. But what of the people who do truly believe this? Are they sinning if they vote for the pro-abortion candidate becasue they believe abortion rates will go down?
 
Mysterium Fidei said:
The social teaching of the Vatican II sect is essentially Marxist. You are not to commit any environmental crimes such as using plastic drinking straws or running the air conditioning too low.
Click to expand...
Really? So Vatican II denies the right people have to own property? What Vatican II document teaches that? I have read the documents--albeit a long time ago--so maybe my memory is wrong--but I do not remember Marxist teachings.
Mysterium Fidei said:
You must accept the idea of wealth redistribution from the wealthy to the "marginalized."
Click to expand...
Quotes? Citations? Context?
Mysterium Fidei said:
You must wholeheartedly accept the LGBTQ/sodomite/pedophile/child genital mutilation agenda.
Click to expand...
Where does Vatican II teach this? Quotes, citations, and context, please.
Mysterium Fidei said:
You must endorse the unrestricted migration of people of a different ethnicity, religion, and culture into European countries to the destruction of their culture, heritage, national sovereignty, and religion.
Click to expand...
Where does Vatican II teaches this? Quotes, citations, and context, please.
Mysterium Fidei said:
Most of all, you must be tolerant of any religion and of any belief, with the exception of Catholicism. That is the one thing that cannot be tolerated.
Click to expand...
So.....what? We should not tolerate people who do not share our Faith? Is that what you are suggesting? Should we go round up all the non-Catholics and force them to convert or die?
 
romishpopishorganist said:
I absolutely believe that killing babies in the womb is murder.
Click to expand...
We agree. The word that is translated as "perverse" amplifies how far off God's standard humanity really is. It refers to something that has been severely twisted and distorted. I shudder when I think how twisted our society has become in presenting vices such as homosexuality and abortion not only as right, but also as fundamental rights to be protected. Those who strive to emulate our Lord Jesus are to shine as lights to such a world.
 
romishpopishorganist said:
Atemi said:
Like most Catholics, you do not believe killing babies in the womb is murder.
Click to expand...
I absolutely believe that killing babies in the womb is murder.

Atemi said:
Would it be a sin to vote for a pro murder candidate?
Click to expand...
Those who would vote for a pro-murder candidate argue that the murder (abortion) rate goes down under pro-abortion presidents, while it goes up under anti-abortion presidents. They argue that this is becasue pro-abortion presidents support abortion, but they also support policies that help single mothers so that they would be less likely to have an abortion.

What if you vote for the pro-murder candidate becasue in doing so, you believe the murder rate will go down?

I do not buy that myself and I never vote for pro-murder candidates. But what of the people who do truly believe this? Are they sinning if they vote for the pro-abortion candidate becasue they believe abortion rates will go down?
Click to expand...

You said an awful lot to make sure not to answer the question!

Amazing. Even this, as simple as it is, Catholics are scared to address.
 
RayneBeau said:
We agree. The word that is translated as "perverse" amplifies how far off God's standard humanity really is. It refers to something that has been severely twisted and distorted. I shudder when I think how twisted our society has become in presenting vices such as homosexuality and abortion not only as right, but also as fundamental rights to be protected. Those who strive to emulate our Lord Jesus are to shine as lights to such a world.
Click to expand...
What bothers me in the modern world----is that Satan doesn't even have to WORK all that hard anymore at getting people to believe his lies.

I mean--it is manifestly obvious that there are two genders. It is manifestly obvious that human sexuality, by nature is heterosexual. Yet---despite the obvious people--with PhD's deny the obvious-----and they get promoted, honored, published, etc.

There was a time when Satan actually had to work to get people to accept his lies. He doesn't even have to work anymore. THAT to me is what is the scariest. People no longer have the ability to think critically or reason. Truth is based on emotion and passion.
 
romishpopishorganist said:
What bothers me in the modern world----is that Satan doesn't even have to WORK all that hard anymore at getting people to believe his lies.
Click to expand...

True.

He needs only get the Catholic Masters to promote them, for example.



romishpopishorganist said:
People no longer have the ability to think critically or reason. Truth is based on emotion and passion.
Click to expand...

Of course!

Devout Catholics admit they will follow their RC Masters no matter what they teach.

That is neither thinking critically or reasonable. Just emotion and passion.
 
romishpopishorganist said:
Really? So Vatican II denies the right people have to own property? What Vatican II document teaches that? I have read the documents--albeit a long time ago--so maybe my memory is wrong--but I do not remember Marxist teachings.

Quotes? Citations? Context?

Where does Vatican II teach this? Quotes, citations, and context, please.

Where does Vatican II teaches this? Quotes, citations, and context, please.

So.....what? We should not tolerate people who do not share our Faith? Is that what you are suggesting? Should we go round up all the non-Catholics and force them to convert or die?
Click to expand...
Sir, you have now over 10 years of speeches, addresses, and interviews of your Marxist "pope" to draw from. Mr. Bergoglio speaks much more on social issues than he does of the gospel. The major themes are the "poor", the "marginalized", the environment, the plight of refugees. I mean, he wrote an entire encyclical on the environment, Laudato si'.

What, do you expect me to do all the work for you?
 
Mysterium Fidei said:
Sir, you have now over 10 years of speeches, addresses, and interviews of your Marxist "pope" to draw from. Mr. Bergoglio speaks much more on social issues than he does of the gospel. The major themes are the "poor", the "marginalized", the environment, the plight of refugees. I mean, he wrote an entire encyclical on the environment, Laudato si'.
Click to expand...
I am confused: are we talking about Vatican II or Bergoglio? Maybe I misunderstood.

I understood you to be claiming that Vatican II is Marxist, etc. THAT was what I was responding to, THAT was what I was asking the citations for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top