There is irrefutable evidence from Polonium halos that the rock layers of the Grand Canyon where all formed in a short time, the worldwide flood.

SavedByTheLord

Well-known member
There is direct irrefutable evidence from Polonium halos that the rock layers of the Grand Canyon where all formed within a short time, during the worldwide flood.

Robert Gentry has made several startling discoveries about certain granites, certain coalified wood samples, and polonium radio halos which he found in each. These have shown that the earth was formed instantly and that the rock layers of the Colorado Plateau where all formed in about 1 year, the result of the worldwide flood. This is all documented in his book “Creation’s Tiny Mystery”.

The part that shows that the rock layers of the Colorado Plateau where all formed within a short time, the result of the worldwide flood, is documented in chapter 4 of the book. In particular, Gentry has documented that there was a single event that produced these rocks layers, which evolutionist claim took supposedly took about 50 to 200 million years. Each coalified wood samples from each of 3 separate rock layers has a set of secondary polonium 210 halos, some elliptical and some circular. The elliptical ones were at one time circular but were flattened by the weight of the above layers while the lower layer containing the polonium 210 halos was still wet and in a gel like state. The circular ones formed after when those layers were hardened. This was documented in these 3 layers.

Please read that chapter as well as the rest of the book if you can so that you can understand this completely.

You can read of his work with primordial polonium 210, 214, and 218 halos which proves that the earth was created instantly. You can also read about why these granites were not from a cooled molten state. You can read about a falsification test challenge that Gentry has given for both of these. You can read about the polonium 210 halos that prove that the worldwide flood happened. You can read about the ratio of U-238 to Pb-206 that is off by a factor of 10,000 in these samples. You read about the discrimination that and censorship he faced due to the implications of his discoveries. And a lot more.
 
There is direct irrefutable evidence from Polonium halos that the rock layers of the Grand Canyon where all formed within a short time, during the worldwide flood.

Robert Gentry has made several startling discoveries about certain granites, certain coalified wood samples, and polonium radio halos which he found in each. These have shown that the earth was formed instantly and that the rock layers of the Colorado Plateau where all formed in about 1 year, the result of the worldwide flood. This is all documented in his book “Creation’s Tiny Mystery”.

The part that shows that the rock layers of the Colorado Plateau where all formed within a short time, the result of the worldwide flood, is documented in chapter 4 of the book. In particular, Gentry has documented that there was a single event that produced these rocks layers, which evolutionist claim took supposedly took about 50 to 200 million years. Each coalified wood samples from each of 3 separate rock layers has a set of secondary polonium 210 halos, some elliptical and some circular. The elliptical ones were at one time circular but were flattened by the weight of the above layers while the lower layer containing the polonium 210 halos was still wet and in a gel like state. The circular ones formed after when those layers were hardened. This was documented in these 3 layers.

Please read that chapter as well as the rest of the book if you can so that you can understand this completely.

You can read of his work with primordial polonium 210, 214, and 218 halos which proves that the earth was created instantly. You can also read about why these granites were not from a cooled molten state. You can read about a falsification test challenge that Gentry has given for both of these. You can read about the polonium 210 halos that prove that the worldwide flood happened. You can read about the ratio of U-238 to Pb-206 that is off by a factor of 10,000 in these samples. You read about the discrimination that and censorship he faced due to the implications of his discoveries. And a lot more.
When you resurrect an old creationist PRATT like this, all we have to do is to reference the existing refutations of that old PRATT: Polonium Haloes Refuted.

You lose again, SBTL. Actually you lost before you posted this stuff because you didn't bother to check for existing refutations of Gentry.
 
When you resurrect an old creationist PRATT like this, all we have to do is to reference the existing refutations of that old PRATT: Polonium Haloes Refuted.

You lose again, SBTL. Actually you lost before you posted this stuff because you didn't bother to check for existing refutations of Gentry.
So you have not read Gentry’s book and without knowing what his reasoning and evidence you accepted this person’s false refutation.
Why do evolutionists not even understand science when it comes to origins?
 
So you have not read Gentry’s book and without knowing what his reasoning and evidence you accepted this person’s false refutation.
So you have not read Dr. Baillieul’s article and without knowing what his reasoning and evidence are you rejected his true refutation.

Show us, specifically, where Dr. Baillieul is wrong.
 
So you have not read Dr. Baillieul’s article and without knowing what his reasoning and evidence are you rejected his true refutation.

Show us, specifically, where Dr. Baillieul is wrong.
I have looked at that article a few times and he just does not address what Gentry found.
 
I have looked at that article a few times and he just does not address what Gentry found.
Failing to answer the question. I asked where Dr. Baillieul was wrong. I would expect that a short article would not address all of the points in a book. However, Dr. Baillieul's article is enough to show that there is a better scientific explanation for polonium halos, one that does not require miracles.
 
Failing to answer the question. I asked where Dr. Baillieul was wrong. I would expect that a short article would not address all of the points in a book. However, Dr. Baillieul's article is enough to show that there is a better scientific explanation for polonium halos, one that does not require miracles.
He had no real explanation because he did not address the evidence that Gentry showed in his book.
And no one has met either of Gentry’s simple challenges.
 
Of course the energy to do that is beyond the technology of today.
But the challenge by Ge is not,
So your analogy is off.
Time travel is also beyond the technology of today.

Gentry is wrong because his base assumptions are wrong. Not being a geologist he assumes that all Precambrian granite samples are "primordial rock". The Precambrian period covers 7/8 of the earth's history. He is just not competent to reach the conclusions he did given the false assumptions they are based on. Garbage in, garbage out
 
Time travel is also beyond the technology of today.

Gentry is wrong because his base assumptions are wrong. Not being a geologist he assumes that all Precambrian granite samples are "primordial rock". The Precambrian period covers 7/8 of the earth's history. He is just not competent to reach the conclusions he did given the false assumptions they are based on. Garbage in, garbage out
Of course the Precambrian granites are primordial.
The polonium halos proved it,
 
How so? Please quote from the link provided and show how it is wrong by addressing the information in the article.
They do not address the evidence that Gentry discovered.
And neither have you.
So there is now yet another proof that the worldwide flood happened and none have refuted it,
There are also several things from Gentry which also prove the 6-day recent creation.
 
They do not address the evidence that Gentry discovered.
And neither have you.
So there is now yet another proof that the worldwide flood happened and none have refuted it,
There are also several things from Gentry which also prove the 6-day recent creation.
He didn't discover anything. The article shows that his fundamental assumptions are wrong. He is a physicist trying to do geology and getting the basics wrong. It would take someone with a hermetically sealed mind to read the article and not conclude that Gentry was wrong. Either you dare not read it, or your mind is just not open to learning. I suspect both.
 
He didn't discover anything. The article shows that his fundamental assumptions are wrong. He is a physicist trying to do geology and getting the basics wrong. It would take someone with a hermetically sealed mind to read the article and not conclude that Gentry was wrong. Either you dare not read it, or your mind is just not open to learning. I suspect both.
Prove any of these conjectures of yours.
 
Back
Top