True, but your meta-projection is.
Besides, your argument has already been refuted plenty of times in this thread: you're projecting your unbelief onto others.
No it hasn't. And I can prove that it is in fact you here who is projecting there unbelief, because it is you as a unbeliever who thinks their unbelief is a logical position and not me. I believe that a belief is the only logical position to place one's worldview. However, it is unbelievers like yourself who falsely believe a unbelief (atheism) is capable containing a worldview. Believers believe that belief makes the truth and reality known to them. And unbelievers disbelieve belief makes the truth and reality known to them.
You lack belief in belief's ability to make falsehoods known to you as truths.
You are grasping at straws here and wallowing in illogical nonsense, as "falsehoods" are not knowable in reality. get a grip.
This is reality. Belief is insufficient to make the truth known to you. Everyone here BUT YOU understands this.
No, that isn't reality. Reality is that belief is necessary and must occur in reality before the truth is known to you. And your opinion as to belief's sufficiency is irrelevant in reality, because in reality belief is necessary and must occur before the truth is known to you.
So, if you disbelieve that belief is capable of making the truth and reality known to you, then you have a unbelieving mind and don't have what is necessary in order to make the truth and reality known to you. And there is no middle ground here, you either believe the means by which the truth and reality is known to us works in making the truth and reality is known to us or you don't. And therefore; you have embraced unbelief and the only means by which the truth and reality is unknown to you.
The Law of Excluded Middle can be expressed by the propositional formula p_¬p. It means that a statement is either true or false. In this case you are either a believer (a believing mind) or a unbeliever (a unbelieving mind) and there is no middle ground between believing and disbelieving, as you either believe a proposition is true or you disbelieve it. Every statement has to be one or the other. That’s why it’s called the law of excluded middle, because it excludes a middle ground between truth and reality and falsity and delusion. So, while the law of non-contradiction tells us that no statement can be both true and false, the law of excluded middle tells us that they must all be one or the other. And if you think that there is a middle ground, then you have violated the Law of Non-contradiction already.