Pixie, you cannot use intelligence with bad, it does not work.
So you are saying Hitler was good? Interesting...
Thus, if you insist that, then, rediscover intelligence too, and let us compare. THAT IS MY CHALLENGE to my original falsification article.
I remember that challenge. As I recall I won by default as you were unable to bring a definition of intelligence to the discussion. You want to try again? I am happy to.
Again, if intelligence is good, then, non-intelligence is bad. That is logic.
Why does that follow?
Consider balls.
Balls are round. Does it therefore follow that non-balls are not round? What about planets and oranges? Obviously not.
Consider humans.
Humans are intelligent. Does it therefore follow that all non-humans are non-intelligent? As a Christian, are you happy to say that God is not intelligent?
It turns out that if a set of things have two properties (intelligence and good; or is a ball and round; or is human and intelligence), it does not necessarily follow that everything that lacks one of those properties lacks the other.
You reasoning here is clearly flawed.
If you would like to say that there is the middle, fine. Show it in a science article. But you cannot violate logic.
Apparently violating logic is your thing...
And it is pretty obvious there
is a middle. Every one of us was originally an embryo without a brain; something that was not intelligent. Now we are intelligent. Now either there was a specific instant where we suddenly switched from non-intelligent to intelligent, or our intelligence gradually increased.
We can also see limited intelligent in animals such as octopuses, dogs and parrots. This is pretty well established.
But in Biology and in biological world, there is no middle (error with life) since biological cell is intelligently and importantly designed, which means, the cell will surely base its function primarily on importance to live, thus, a non-intelligence change from Evolution is not part of Biology nor reality, thus Evolution is wrong and falsified! The correct one is Biological Interrelation, BiTs.
Your argument here is founded on the premise "
biological cell is intelligently and importantly designed". And yet this is exactly what you purport to prove! Your argument is circular. Once again you violate logic.
I am correct and precise in dealing with Biology, in science and in reality! You are totally wrong!
Well you have convinced yourself of that.
The reality is quite different. The reality is that your reasoning is flawed in so many places.