stiggy wiggy
Well-known member
So are you going to go to an expert? I doubt it, too afraid.
Expertise is in the eye of the blatherer.
So are you going to go to an expert? I doubt it, too afraid.
Tell that to Cross Crow, he thinks he's an expert.Expertise is in the eye of the blatherer.
Something is peer reviewed if it is reviewed by a peer.
But what is a peer? According to Merriam Webster, a peer is:
"one that is of equal standing with another : EQUAL
especially : one belonging to the same societal group especially based on age, grade, or status"
But who reviews the "standing" to determine if there is "equality?" Second class peers? Peers, once removed?
What about "scholars?" What is a scholar, and what scholarly qualifications are required to designate one as a scholar? Are PHD's required?
Were Isaac Newton's discoveries peer reviewed? Were Paul's doctrines? Who were Paul's peers? John? Peter? Did Paul get Peter to review his doctrine about the acceptance of gentiles? No. Quite the opposite.
My favorite peer review is in Genesis 1:3-4:
3 "And God said, “Let there be light,” and there was light. 4 God saw that the light was good."
Here we see the mystery of the Trinity. God reviews His own work. The Father, Son and Holy Spirit are EQUAL.
Of course, He has no other peers.
Yes, I'm shaking in my boots.So are you going to go to an expert? I doubt it, too afraid.
Why are you not properly investigating whether you have a point or not? You're strutting around here claiming victory because people like me who are not experts can't answer your question, but you won't ask it of those who can.Yes, I'm shaking in my boots.
NEXT
Victory....absolutely....as you STILL can't explain how an assembly line of organelle evolve...yet still have bad things to say about creation science.Why are you not properly investigating whether you have a point or not? You're strutting around here claiming victory because people like me who are not experts can't answer your question, but you won't ask it of those who can.
Why are you changing the subject away from you asking your question of someone qualified to answer it?Victory....absolutely....as you STILL can't explain how an assembly line of organelle evolve...yet still have bad things to say about creation science.
I have already answerd that question...why can't you recognize that fact????Why are you changing the subject away from you asking your question of someone qualified to answer it?
A consensus doesn't make something true.By far the academic consensus is that evolution is true and for very good reasons, so I'll take the scientific point of view over yours that has no science behind it every time.
You answered my question vaguely, hardly satisfactorily.I have already answerd that question...why can't you recognize that fact????
This is a forum. An online forum....the problem is you are hiding behind some make believe scientist who you have FAITH in answering a question that you don't have the answer to.
Did you watch the videos I presented?
A consensus doesn't make something true.
Once again, Did you watch the videos I presented?
Nor does a computer-generated video.A consensus doesn't make something true.
Once again, Did you watch the videos I presented?
Considering that is your only response shows a Mr. Bojangles dance on your part.You answered my question vaguely, hardly satisfactorily.
I agree that a consensus on it's own doesn't make something true, but the reasons for the consensus can and in this case does.
You not wanting to take your question to academia is a blatant dodge on your part.
The "computer generated video" portrays the reality.....much like a computer generated video showed the landing of Martial rovers.Nor does a computer-generated video.
Computer generated videos portrait whatever the creators of the video want. Have you ever watched a Pixar movie? Spoiler alert:They are no real.The "computer generated video" portrays the reality.....much like a computer generated video showed the landing of Martial rovers.
Are you saying a motor protein walking across a microtubule doesn't exist???????Computer generated videos portrait whatever the creators of the video want. Have you ever watched a Pixar movie? Spoiler alert:They are no real.
No,. I am saying computer generated videos portrait whatever the creators of the video want. That is why I said "Computer generated videos portrait whatever the creators of the video want."Are you saying a motor protein walking across a microtubule doesn't exist???????
Of course it doesn't, because I admit I can't answer it because I don't have the expertise, so I suggest you ask it of those who do, and you're remarkably reluctant to do so. It's not hard to understand why.Considering that is your only response shows a Mr. Bojangles dance on your part.
Yes, but so what? Why are you asking me? I have admitted I don't have the expertise to address it. Why aren't you showing it to an expert to see what he/she will say?have you watched the videos?
Let me guess....next you'll be telling me the creator of the videos is making this stuff up.No,. I am saying computer generated videos portrait whatever the creators of the video want. That is why I said "Computer generated videos portrait whatever the creators of the video want."
What I am telling you is that something claimed in a fancy video is not necessarily true.Let me guess....next you'll be telling me the creator of the videos is making this stuff up.
How would you know, if you don't ask. You're just making excuses though.lots of time they link you to a 100 page document and say.....the answer is in there, go read it.
The latest is telling me to go seek out and find an expert on the subject.....as if they'll have the answer.
Then prove what the video shows isn't true....or go away. It's that simple.What I am telling you is that something claimed in a fancy video is not necessarily true.