Regardless of whatever quotes you find, official or un-official, that contain some words you consider to be "taboo", it still does not address the question: "Do mormons believe in a "works-based" salvation?" In other words, "Do mormons teach salvation comes by obedience alone, and works of the Law, in contrast to what Paul taught?" The answer is "no".
This is called a "straw-man" argument.
NOBODY here is claiming Mormons believe salvation is by "works alone", or, "obedience alone". If you disagree, then please QUOTE where any critic has argued that. Guess what? You can't, because we've never argued that way.
There are three positions on salvation:
1) grace alone
2) works alone
3) grace + works.
The Mormon view claims works are required, but ALSO claims grace. But there are two problems with that view:
1) All the "not by works" passages which Mormons keep IGNORING (Eph. 2:8-9, 2 Tim. 1:9, Tit. 3:5, Rom. 4:1-6, 9:11-13, 11:5-6, etc. etc.)
2) The fact that the Bible teaches that "grace" and "works" are MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE (Rom. 11:5-6, 2 Tim. 1:9, Eph. 2:5-9, etc.)
But God is the one who decides if a blessing (including eternal life) is bestowed or not.
You are contradicting your Mormon brethren, who teach that eternal life is a free gift GIVEN to everyone.
This is a very simple matter. The Book of Mormon clearly rejects infant baptism. Do you have any explanation of this teaching if it's Mormon belief that salvation is "works" based?
I don't understand your question. It's like asking, "If the sky is blue, explain why planes are able to fly."
But it seems incredibly inconsistent and contradictory for Mormons to reject infant baptism.
Why is it that someone can "accept" a proxy baptism done to another, but they can't "accept" a proxy baptism done to themselves in infancy?