I was just thinking about this the other day. If this event is so important in the founding of the Church, why does it only appear in 1 of the 4 gospels? Mark and Luke have the account of the interaction, however their accounts lack any mention of rocks, keys, binding or loosing. If this event was the founding of Christ's Church on Earth, why is it only mentioned once? The event is not even recorded in John's gospel. When you read the conversation in the 3 gospels where it is recorded, the recurring theme is for the apostles not to reveal Jesus as the Messiah.
The official interpreter of scripture
- Thread starter dingoling.
- Start date
You mean He's not talking to you? Despite having been Confirmed in your early teens? (Don't worry - He didn't speak to me, either, before I was reborn. Why should He speak to a rebel – except to convict them of sin, righteousness, and judgment? And the natural man rejects such.)
--Rich
"Esse quam videri"
dingoling.
Well-known member
Whatever you want to believe I guess. I don't believe it
dingoling.
Well-known member
That is a good argument. I used that same argument about being imputed with the righteousness of Christ. How many places do we see this doctrine mentioned in scripture? That argument didn't work because the Christians said that it didn't matter.
dingoling.
Well-known member
Translation - you can't give us the official interpretation of scripture by the Holy Spirit.
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
Of course you don’t believe it it’s the truth.
dingoling.
Well-known member
Why should I believe that it is the truth?
Leatherneck0311
Well-known member
Because it is in the scripture that God provided for us. I know it contradicts what your cult of Mary believes.
1Thess521
Well-known member
a lot of people (vipers) have authority: that doesn't make their teaching infallible:
that is why i asked you if the official interpreter meant infallible interpreter
You said it does
Nope! The translation is YOU REFUSE AND REJECT WHAT THE HOLY SPIRIT OF GOD IS TELLING YOU, preferring the fleshly allure of the RCC.
--Rich
"Esse quam videri"
1Thess521
Well-known member
settled?
Once again, Pope Francis says Mary is not the ‘co-redemptrix’
Francis says Mary is not ‘co-redemptrix’
Pope Francis said yesterday the Virgin Mary is not a co-redemptrix with Christ, a title which some theological movements in recent decades have tried to assign to the Mother of God. Source: Crux.
dingoling.
Well-known member
No it is not in scripture, it is your interpretation of scripture.
dingoling.
Well-known member
The Pope has been given authority. What did Jesus teach his disciples about those holding the position of authority?
dingoling.
Well-known member
The Holy Spirit is telling me that the Pope has the authority.
1Thess521
Well-known member
got it : the Pope has authority
Is " Mary is not the ‘co-redemptrix’" an infallible statement?
Which is exactly what happened here:
Act 4:19 [MKJV1962] But Peter and John answered and said to them [the scribes and Pharisees] "Whether it is right before God to listen to you more than to God, you judge."
[/SARCASM]
And who led the cries of "Crucify Him!" and who said, "We have no king but Caesar!"? Hmmm... I guess the RCC is doing as the scribes and Pharisees taught! ? ?
--Rich
"Esse quam videri"
dingoling.
Well-known member
If the Pope was speaking excathdra then yes.
1Thess521
Well-known member
you seemed to be very confused about authority:
For instance:
you seem to think an official interpretation means infallible:
you seem to think that once an official interpretation is rendered: all debate ends.
Your church has officially interpreted hundreds of Scripture (see the CCC) but only 6 infallibly
(do you understand the difference?)
1Thess521
Well-known member
You tell us: was was the Pope speaking excathdra ?
When was the last time a Pope spoke excathdra ?
dingoling.
Well-known member
- and yet Jesus taught his disciples to "do whatever they teach you and follow it...."