This is laughable because you are the only one here making claims absent evidence.
I've presented evidence, and arguments to back up my position.
With every post this thread looks increasingly like a huge troll.
You're projecting.
God exists outside of time and space.
So you say, but what does that have to do with knowledge?
This is self-evident in the opening statement of scripture: "
In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth," and elsewhere scripture tells us all that was made was made by God such that things that were not were made. Time is simply the measure of cause and effect, and God is The Causal Agent of all causes and all effects, either directly or indirectly. It all starts with Him. God does not exist solely within the singularity. We do. He is not in any way, shape, or form (no pun intended
) bound by the limits of anything in creation, including time and space.
Given that knowledge would be included in your "anything", it stands to reason that God cannot be bound by the limitations of knowledge. Again, only God is good, and therefore, the ontological reality in no way requires any additional mediators, but most especially knowledge of good.
We are.
We are finite. He is infinite. So when you limit God
Strawman argument. I'm not limiting God.
to a finite condition such as the limits between ontology and epistemology
There are no limits to being, but there are limits to knowledge; the most notable being the fact that the faculty of knowing can never be what it knows. That's a severe limitation YOU are placing on God, not me.
Being or existence is eternal. This is a logical necessity due to the fact that to articulate the opposite leads inevitably to a violation of the law of non-contradiction, e.g. existence doesn't exist; nothing exists.
the onus is not on me to prove otherwise.
See above.
The onus is on you to prove God is God and not human.
No. That's another topic for another discussion. This topic is about whether or not God can know the difference between good and evil.
You are the one applying finite human terms anthropomorphically on the infinite God and doing so without any evidence for doing so.
Okay, I'll play. Transcendence must necessarily transcend all understanding as well as everything that exists including the one common denominator of everything that exists, i.e. existence itself.
By definition, omniscience is without any regard to a Knower or whatever can be known, but exclusively to the faculty itself. Therefore it cannot be known. Nothing can ever be known about omniscience.
In 1 Corinthians 8:6, Paul points out that God is the origin while Christ is the means by which everything comes into existence including Christ who affirms this fact when he says that he comes from the Father. Again, if the means by which everything comes into existence originates in God, then God logically cannot exist. God only exists conceptually, but God is not a concept. The concept of God is not God. Therefore there can be no referent for God other than the term itself. As John puts it, "the Word".
God's knowledge is an extension of His being;
This is your assumption, and you have yet to supply any arguments supporting this assumption.