Faithoverbelief
Well-known member
I'm not for the banning of books. There is material not suited for 5 year olds.Glad to see you are for the banning of books, because in the OP you asserted the following:
Banning books is fascist.
I'm not for the banning of books. There is material not suited for 5 year olds.Glad to see you are for the banning of books, because in the OP you asserted the following:
Banning books is fascist.
I'm not for the banning of books.
There is material not suited for 5 year olds.
“fact based” ? You mean like “based” on a true story???Are you saying you think misinformation should be treated as if it were the equivalent of fact-based information?
Careful, you might offend some Muslims.man/women
slave girls don’t count as adultery
pretty poor attempt at a deflectionCareful, you might offend some Muslims.
Deflection from what? Your attempt to conflate Christian teaching with ancient Jewish Law?pretty poor attempt at a deflection
you don’t seem very familiar with ChristianityDeflection from what? Your attempt to conflate Christian teaching with ancient Jewish Law?
Talk about misinformation. Smhyou don’t seem very familiar with Christianity
sleeping with slave girls is fine and dandy according to your religion
I am aware you people subscribe to a version of Christianity that was made up in America in the past few decades.Talk about misinformation. Smh
According to your own standards, you should be banned.
Which people??? I know you’re not talking about me or my people.I am aware you people subscribe to a version of Christianity that was made up in America in the past few decades.
Are there a lot of others, backup?????? I guess we’re just supposed to take your word for it???There are a lot of others
When asked if you'd be ok with banning books on bestiality, you said No.I'm not for the banning of books. There is material not suited for 5 year olds.
You don’t have to believe that other Christian denominations exist. Denying reality is kind of your thing.Which people??? I know you’re not talking about me or my people.
Are there a lot of others, backup?????? I guess we’re just supposed to take your word for it???
What a load of crap.
No idea what you meanman/women
slave girls don’t count as adultery
We follow Christ. That was the point being made ??????you don’t seem very familiar with Christianity
sleeping with slave girls is fine and dandy according to your religion
Sed the Roy Moore voter...Notice LWingers cherish sexual predators
And conflation is yours. As well as deflection.You don’t have to believe that other Christian denominations exist.
Denying reality is kind of your thing.
I am aware you people subscribe to a version of Christianity that was made up in America in the past few decades.
Well considering porn is not protected by free speech per Scotus you are absolutely mistaken.Yes, you are - which is proved by the following...
No.We follow Christ.
It depends on the content.When asked if you'd be ok with banning books on bestiality, you said No.
Bestiality is generally illegal, and recognized as harmful to the animals. Homosexuality, so long as it takes place between consenting adults, is not.
For this reason, I'd be OK with banning books on bestiality. I mean, if someone really wants to read about it, I wouldn't want goose-stepping Enforcers tracking down the offending readers. Nonetheless, I wouldn't consider banning books about bestiality - or any illegal practice in which harm is done to sentient creatures - to be fascist.
Would you disagree with me?