dingoling.
Well-known member
Sure we can, if we understand scripture correctly.so then propitiation did not happen at the Last Supper.
You can't have it both ways
Thanks
Sure we can, if we understand scripture correctly.so then propitiation did not happen at the Last Supper.
You can't have it both ways
Thanks
proving my point:Sure we can, if we understand scripture correctly.
No it doesn't.proving my point:
Your version of the Cross is meaningless
tell usNo it doesn't.
I know they seem to keep changing their minds.so then propitiation did not happen at the Last Supper.
You can't have it both ways
Thanks
Oh yes it does.No it doesn't.
True you limit yourself to looking at scripture from the point of view of the pope and his cronies. Most of them are proven to be unreliable in their fruit, and if they were not personally involved they ignored sin and become part of it that way. We have seen the logic you apply to scripture. We see you are unable to answer valid questins about your perspective. The RCC interpretation are false and not in scripture and even goes against God's commandments, it has Jesus with spots.False. I don't limit myself to looking at scripture from one person's understanding. I didn't limit myself from looking at scripture from the nCCs perspective. I looked at it from the CCs perspective. As a Berean Christian I examined different perspectives and examined them with scripture and determined that the CC has it correct.
And that is the problem your institution clearly does not understand scripture correctly and you have failed to prove that it does. If you cannot answer simple questions then you have a major problem in the interpretation.Sure we can, if we understand scripture correctly.
You don't have the authority to make such a declaration.Oh yes it does.
You don't have the authority to make such a declaration.
You said that your have proven your point. Your point hasn't been proven. I already explained the ideas as to why.Logical fallacies 101
An argument from authority, also known as an appeal to authority, is a logical fallacy that relies on the status of the person cited instead of their ideas.
You said that your have proven your point. Your point hasn't been proven. I already explained the ideas as to why.
That doesn't prove that it is wrong.Your version of the Cross is meaningless
prove me wrong here:
What is the salvific effect of the Cross?
Catholics, In regards to propitiation, the New Covent going into effect: and our sins being paid, what took place on the Cross that did not take place at the Last Supper?forums.carm.org
you can prove me wrong by agreeing that propitiation, the New Covent going into effect, and our sins being paid, all took place on the Cross and not at the Last SupperThat doesn't prove that it is wrong.
No, what you keep telling us is that scripture is the supreme/ultimate authority, scripture says very clearly that the blood of covenant is the contents of the cup. The supreme/ultimate doesn't say anything else as being the blood of the covenant. That in an of itself proves you wrong.you can prove me wrong by agreeing that propitiation, the New Covent going into effect, and our sins being paid, all took place on the Cross and not at the Last Supper
so what is your problem, dingNo, what you keep telling us is that scripture is the supreme/ultimate authority, scripture says very clearly that the blood of covenant is the contents of the cup. The supreme/ultimate doesn't say anything else as being the blood of the covenant. That in an of itself proves you wrong.
No, what you keep telling us is that scripture is the supreme/ultimate authority, scripture says very clearly that the blood of covenant is the contents of the cup. The supreme/ultimate doesn't say anything else as being the blood of the covenant. That in an of itself proves you wrong.
Yes it is very plain, "...this is my body...this is my blood of the covenant..."All the words of my mouth are in righteousness;
there is nothing froward or perverse in them.
9 They are all plain (EZY) to him that understandeth,
and right to them that find knowledge.
so what is your problem, ding
They are all plain (EZY) to him that understandeth,
and right to them that find knowledge.
--------The Waysiders---------
When any one heareth the word of the kingdom,
and understandeth it not,
then cometh the wicked one, and catcheth away that which was sown in his heart.
This is he which received seed by the way side.
This question of the thread is - What is the salvific effect of the Last Supper? The wine is the blood of the covenant that is poured out for the forgiveness of sins. At least that is what scripture says. If you want to start another thread that would be great. Thanks.What happened to the bread and wine after Jesus ate it?
Did it become his body?
Where did his body go the next day?
This question of the thread is - What is the salvific effect of the Last Supper? The wine is the blood of the covenant that is poured out for the forgiveness of sins. At least that is what scripture says. If you want to start another thread that would be great. Thanks.