Can it cross you mind, that all conversions cannot be lumped together?How vague can you get?
Can it cross you mind, that all conversions cannot be lumped together?How vague can you get?
That post of mine says absolutely nothing about how people vote!!In post 666 (you will miss the irony) in your passive aggressive way you were condescending in your analysis of why faith based believers vote like they do
You behave in the classic passive aggressive manner.That post of mine says absolutely nothing about how people vote!!
Nothing whatsoever.
I ask again. Why do you distort what I have said over and over in very clear English?
Can you fail to admit that children taught early enough will accept the religion of their parents?Can it cross you mind, that all conversions cannot be lumped together?
Oh please.You behave in the classic passive aggressive manner.
Unlike you, I believe some do and some don’t.Can you fail to admit that children taught early enough will accept the religion of their parents?
I have dealt with enough passive aggressive people in my life, to know that you check off a lot of the boxes.Oh please.
You have no actual reasoned responses, so you accuse me of being passive aggressive or you claim to read my mind to "show" what I "really" believe.
And I have personally known some to totally regret the values of their parents.Can you fail to admit that children taught early enough will accept the religion of their parents?
Oh please, you are not qualified to judge a person you have never actually met.I have dealt with enough passive aggressive people in my life, to know that you check off a lot of the boxes.
Notice the preacher of abortionism is just as extreme as Democrate Fred Phelps was against Homosexuals,You behave in the classic passive aggressive manner.
And yet , when Trump was President, the media interviewed shrinks who would make a diagnosis, having never met him.Oh please, you are not qualified to judge a person you have never actually met.
This is nothing more than a distraction. You cannot respond to the points I raised, so instead you resort to personal insults.
Are you trying to say that a person cannot drawn conclusions from their words.Oh please, you are not qualified to judge a person you have never actually met.
This is nothing more than a distraction. You cannot respond to the points I raised, so instead you resort to personal insults.
That is what communists dread.Can you fail to admit that children taught early enough will accept the religion of their parents?
More personal insults. Your parrot stew and insults fail.Oh please.
You have no actual reasoned responses, so you accuse me of being passive aggressive or you claim to read my mind to "show" what I "really" believe.
Or the person who claims to be a Christian because they were raised that way, but when they express their beliefs, they hold no Christian bfelief.That is what communists dread.
This is completely true.
Just take a look at the SCOTUS decision and show where there was recognition or concern for the suffering of women with unsafe or unwanted pregnancies. Not there.
Where is the concern for women expressed by the legislatures passing these draconian laws? Nowhere.
Where are the programs championed by conservatives that would ensure that all women have pre- and post-natal care? Nonexistent.
So there is no hope for the millions killed by Hitler? No hope for anyone suffering?I don't care how sorry he is - he orchestrated the deaths of ten million people, so he should get the punishment, not Jesus.
Name a coupleJust trying to explain Protestant dogma, not that it is not all over the place with countless, contradictory sects in America
Mostly yes, until they are adults when they tend to make up their own mind. Same with atheists.Can you fail to admit that children taught early enough will accept the religion of their parents?
The woman does not have the right to live inside another's body without consent.You claimed that women have less [sic] rights than a fetus. I mean…. What on earth are you talking about?