Your logic is faulty:
Does the moon totally obscure the sun? If sometimes then yes it does.
Strawman. What does the moon obscuring the sun have to do with my argument silly? I didn't make that argument, see the quotation "" marks that's you saying "the moon totally obscure the sun? If sometimes then yes it does".
Why won't you deal directly with what I am actually saying instead of building strawman bs that is completely inapplicable to the argument I actually made? What's the connection between my argument and the strawman bs you said above?
Also, if every time the truth and reality is known it had to come via a belief in reality, then every time the truth is made known it is because it was believed. And you can't deny this fundamental truth, that belief is necessary in order to make the truth and reality known 100% of the time without exception.
Is it possible to survive without eating, drinking or shelter? If sometimes, then yes it is.
Are all women infertile? If sometimes, then yes they are.
Does liquid water become solid ice? If sometimes then liquid water is a form of solid ice.
More strawman bs, where is the refutation to my argument in the above silly?
Every single one of your conclusions is baseless illogical and bonkers.
If that were true, then how come you can't refute the argument. Here it is again for your convenience:
1. Does Belief come before knowledge? If Sometimes, then yes it does.
2. Does Belief inform knowledge? If Sometimes, then yes it does.
3. Do Beliefs form knowledge? If Sometimes, then yes it does.
4. Does Belief become knowledge? If Sometimes, then yes it does.
C1: Therefore, Belief must be a form of knowledge. If sometimes, then it Necessarily Follows.
Also:
5. Unbelief can't come before knowledge.
6. Unbelief can't inform knowledge.
7. Unbelief can't form knowledge.
8. Unbelief can't become knowledge.
C2: Therefore, unbelief can't be a form of knowledge. Necessarily Follows.
No knowledge comes from unbelief.
Now, where is your argument that deals directly with my argument?