I have personally debated with other Calvinist that told me the whole world doesn’t mean whole world
Yeah, I tend to doubt that.
"Whole world means whole world" is a worthless tautology.
He probably said, "whole world doesn't mean every single individual", which is how non-Calvinists usually understand the phrase, and he would be right. No lexicon defines "kosmos" as "every single individual" universally.
and whole world only applies to the elect.
That would depend on the context, of course.
You don't seem to like discussing the CONTEXT, you only want to speak in general, hypothetical terms.
You are not interested in bonafide good-faith discussions, only in bashing and bad-mouthing and demonizing Calvinists.
Like I said I believe in scriptural election based on God’s foreknowledge
But you don't seem to understand what the means. You wish to FORCE a meaning of "to know about something in advance", when that is NOT what "foreknow" means in the original Greek. When the object of "foreknowing" (the verb, not the noun) is a person, the meaning is "choose in advance".
not the unscriptural election calvinist believe.
It's not "unscriptural".
What exactly would the good news be if no one has a choice and were elected for hell ? What would you tell those people who were elected for hell is the “good news” ?
If a down-on-their luck person was given a gift of a million dollars, that would CERTAINLY be "good news". The fact that YOU didn't get that gift not only doesn't take away from the fact that it's good news, but it seems INCREDIBLY selfish on your part. It's like you don't care about anyone but yourself.
And not only do we not KNOW who the "non-elect" are, so we can't isolate them to tell them a message, what you seem to be doing is defending sinners (who are not ENTITLED to salvation) against God. You are a God-hater, sir.