of course he did ...that is the sign. are you deny the Lord himself gives the sign?Your adding words. Why are you doing that? God didn't impregnate anybody.
If that is your argument then Isaiah son was not names Immanuel either. Jeshua means God is salvation that is close enoughA young woman conceives... and then the sign continues thru v15-16. Mary and Jesus don't fit the context. The sign includes naming the child Immanuel. Jesus wasn't.
So clearly is was not the son of Isaiah14Therefore the Lord Himself shall give you a sign: behold, the young woman shall conceive, and bear a son, and shall call his name Immanuel. 15Curd and honey shall he eat, when he knoweth to refuse the evil, and choose the good. 16Yea, before the child shall know to refuse the evil, and choose the good, the land whose two kings thou hast a horror of shall be forsaken.
How is that a sign?Yeah a child is born and before he's old to know right and wrong... v15-16.
of course it is virgin, are you suggesting that Eve had sex before Gen 4?Ishah isn't a virgin in Gen 3:15. The context is Eve.
not at the well where she met Abraham's servant. She was a virgin there.Rebecca had descendants too. You were shown this previously.
How does that nullify Gen 24:43 where she is called almah?Rebecca is called a bethulah in v16, she didn't have relations.
You are not making sense The proverb isAlmah doesn't guarantee that, as Proverbs 30:19 proves.
18 Three things are too wonderful for me,
four beyond my knowledge —
19 the way of an eagle in the sky,
the way of a snake on a rock,
the way of a ship on the open sea,
and the way of a man with a girl.
the same word used for Rebecca who is a virgin. This is an unknown girl not connected to the other proverb. Based on what are you claiming she was not a virgin? Oh she cannot be a witness.
Gen 24;43 says almah look it up.Yes. Virgin, bethulah.