This is what he actually said in #30...
I'm opposed to anyone being forced to do much of anything against their will.
If the non Caucasians are being forced to work against their will, then I would be opposed to it. However, if they are voluntarily working then I'm not so sure I would be opposed to it then. I would take the same position if the roles were reversed as well, e.g. Non Caucasians enslaving Caucasians. Ultimately, it really doesn't matter what color their skin is. What matters is whether or not they've being forced to work against their will.
Do you have a point, or are you just trolling?
No. Conservatives were proponents of slavery. The liberals were the abolitionists and Republicans that sought to end it.
Well, people with union jobs and enlightened employers get paid for holidays.
He did not say “in order to deny freedom to slaves.” Those are your words.
It's not a contradiction because the Civil War was not fought over slavery. it was fought over the South's Constitutional right to secede from the union. It wasn't a Civil war at all. The Civil War is a misnomer.
It's against the rules to intentionally misquote someone.
Do you think the South was morally in the right for allowing slavery? And, if so, do you believe that the North was morally in the wrong for banning slavery?
Why do you try to put words and meanings in peoples’ posts that aren’t there? You’ve done that to me, too.
You're repeating yourself.
The north didn't ban slavery. The north simply had a different type of slavery; one that enabled them to pay people slave's wages.
Slave wages? What are you a communist?
Yes, wages that are barely enough to survive on yet they have to keep working because they can't find work anywhere else. For all intents and purposes, it is no different than being a slave.
Evidently, you're more interested in me than the content of my posts. I get that a lot. Perhaps if you focused on what I'm posting instead of me, you wouldn't have to ask so many of these irrelevant questions. If you can't focus on the topic under discussion, I'll just move on. Do you have a point to make, or are you just here to play 20 questions?
I've asked one question? Do I get 18 more? ???
Slavery is alive and well in the US so there's really not all that much to celebrate.
The Republicans under Trump had four years to end slavery. Since, according to you, they didn't, does this mean that Republicans are in favour of slavery?
Trump was the first President to set up a department specifically to end human trafficking. So no, as a party Republicans are not in favor of slavery. That doesn’t mean that some of them don’t participate in trafficking. Just like Democrats. But they’re being rooted out. Trump’s team has been making great progress. Hundreds of kids being rescued, and monsters put in jail.
It’s a holiday for communist.
I don't understand your comment.