We all know that if you disagree with a source it is not reputable.Why is it misinformation to note that the "article" in question is not science, nor from a reputable source?
We all know that if you disagree with a source it is not reputable.Why is it misinformation to note that the "article" in question is not science, nor from a reputable source?
Who voted for the liar?not an “article”
a blog post by a well known conspiracy theorists who spreads COVID misinformation even though he is not qualified to
Freudian slips.Don't you love when they unintentionally tell the truth?
lolLike you post what everyone in the world is thinking, even though you are not qualified to do.
More hot air from you.lol
I still can't believe right-wingers became vaccine deniers during the worst pandemic in American history.
The facts are easily accessible, and familiar to everyone except the extreme right-wing that keeps retreating further and further into their echo chamber.
Nope. I check the reputation of all unfamiliar sources, especially if its claims don't make sense.We all know that if you disagree with a source it is not reputable.
So you just reinforced what I said.Nope. I check the reputation of all unfamiliar sources, especially if its claims don't make sense.
seriouslySo you just reinforced what I said.
Says the person who often claims the whole world agrees with him.seriously
how did you people make it into adulthood without learning basic information gathering skills?
All this direct harm and these Pharmaceutical companies , Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, are protected from law suitOur latest poll is devastating for the official narrative:
- a 6.6% rate of heart injury (>10M Americans)
- 2.7% are unable to work after being vaccinated (>5M Americans),
- 6.3% had to be hospitalized (>10M Americans)
- you were more likely to die from COVID if you’ve taken the vaccine.
- Almost as many (77.4%) households lost someone from the vaccines as from COVID. If you believe that 1M people in the US have died from COVID, then this survey indicates that ~750,000 people died from the vaccine(10.18/13.15*1M) with a 95% confidence of at least 600,000 deaths
Later in the article we read:
For example, the CDC hasn’t found anyone who has died from the mRNA vaccines and our survey shows at least 600,000 people have died. That’s a big gap. Someone isn’t telling you the truth. Why do we get such a high number every time we run our poll to a different audience?
noSays the person who often claims the whole world agrees with him.
Such as the fact of the Steele Dossier?no
on most things involving objective facts and evidence everyone accepts them except right-wing, anti-intellectual, conspiracy theorists
So 2 guys get the jab. Free baseball tickets so they can score infection at the ballpark.They were paying like $100 for persons to get the drive thru vaccines in California, free baseball tickets, etc
Whenever the liberal democrats in California are paying for a vaccine to be injected, I'm running the other way!
Why is it misinformation to note that the "article" in question is not science, nor from a reputable source?
Fact, the Obama administration FBI was investigating President Trump before and after the electionno
on most things involving objective facts and evidence everyone accepts them except right-wing, anti-intellectual, conspiracy theorists
The flow of court cases on the Dow breast implants were heavy 13 years after the products came out.All this direct harm and these Pharmaceutical companies , Moderna, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, are protected from law suit
Perhaps the US government can go further in debt on this one, standing in for liability?
They were paying like $100 for persons to get the drive thru vaccines in California, free baseball tickets, etc
Whenever the liberal democrats in California are paying for a vaccine to be injected, I'm running the other way!
No you did notNope. I check the reputation of all unfamiliar sources, especially if its claims don't make sense.