Steven Avery
Well-known member
Another devious misrepresentation. You don't tell the audience the specifics at all. I didn't bring in ANF/PNF references. YOU DID, as diversion damage control. I was confining my post to Latin NT manuscripts, you let one of your ("helppp I can't answer this") scattergun diversionary fireworks factory explosion here there and everywhere bury the point with as much blatherskite text as possible in quick fire succession.
Of course the early writers give an important window. If they show Holy Spirit before the manuscripts (where you basically worked with "possibilities" of no real substance) then it refutes your attempt to claim some sort of verse construction.
Your problem here is an inability to handle simple logic.
And being addicted to posturing.
As I said, you should go to the absurdist attempts of Grantley McDonald if you want to play that game of theorizing how the heavenly witnesses developed. His is at least good for a laugh.