CrowCross
Well-known member
Provided God's word is interpreted exactly right.You do if you read and accept God's word exactly as written.
Both.Based on scripture? Or based on the latest newscast?
Scripture speaks of a mark...technology currently can provide such a mark.
The question is, do we currently have the technology to read the mark and "report" back to a central location? That answer I don't know. Perhaps once Musks satellites are in orbit we will.
Rev 13 presents a large part of the "beast system"What "beast system"? There's no such thing as a "beast system" in the Bible. The idea of a "beast system" is a doctrinal position held by only one single eschatological view.
We now have for the first time in human history to insert technology under your skin that can be read.ALL the other mainstream Christian eschatologies view the mentions of "beast" (there is more than one beast) much differently. Why subscribe to the one eschatology that creates conditions not actually stated in the text of scripture? Why subscribe to the eschatology that adds to the one book of the Bible that explicitly commands us not to add to or subtract from it? That alone would be reason to dismiss that eschatology.
Rev 13 speaks of it. Rev 13 may not use the term "one world government" but it speaks of a one world government.Again, there is no such thing as a "one world government" in scripture. That is an interpretive view of all bowing to an individual. The only one-world government even remotely asserted in scripture is that of Christ's.
Isaiah 9:6
For a child will be born to us, a son will be given to us; and the government will rest on his shoulders; And His name will be called Wonderful Counselor, Mighty God, Eternal Father, Prince of Peace.
Matthew 28:18
Then Jesus came to them and said, "All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me."
And according to Rev 13 that authority gives much power to the beast systemm.
Rev 13:7 Then the beast was permitted....
No.The belief in a one-world government other than Christ's is literally a god-forsaking view. Isaiah couched the government on the birth of Christ. Was Isaiah wrong?
As i said above:If Isaiah was wrong, then he was not a prophet of God and everything he said can be ignored. If God spoke through Isaiah then Isaiah 9:6 must be believed exactly as written. Does the word "All..." mean all? If so then there is no other authority but that which was given to Jesus. "All" means all. That's either believed exactly as written or it isn't. If Jesus does not have ALL authority, then there are places in his creation where he is not God. The Creator is not God over all aspects of His own creation.
And according to Rev 13 that authority gives much power to the beast systemm.
Rev 13:7 Then the beast was permitted....
Rev 6:2 tells us... the antichrist will ride out to overcome and conquer.
Revelations strongly disagrees.No such thing as a "one world government." That is an invention of modern futurism, a view of scripture popularized in the 1800s. The same holds true with the "one world religion."
Yes, at the end of the tribulation.Zechariah 14:9
And the LORD will be king over all the earth; in that day the LORD will be the only one, and His name the only one.
.