I have already addressed this, but once again, you ignored it and repeated yourself,.....
Which is the standard reply when the critics haven't any viable answer to offer.
I'm still waiting, Bonnie:
dberrie said---Says the lady who believes there is no more need for the temple of God, as found here:
Revelation 7:13-15---King James Version
13 And one of the elders answered, saying unto me, What are these which are arrayed in
white robes? and whence came they?
14 And I said unto him, Sir, thou knowest. And he said to me, These are they which came out of great tribulation, and have washed their robes, and made them white in the blood of the Lamb.
15 Therefore are they before the throne of God,
and serve him day and night in his temple: and he that sitteth on the throne shall dwell among them.
That's not a reference to a physical human body, which means our bodies being a temple does not preclude the need for the temple, and the work which goes on there. If that work wasn't necessary--then there would be no need for the temple, as God is directing that work, in Revelation 7.
The servants referenced there wear white robes--and serve God Himself in His physical temple.
That your church has nothing to compare to that isn't proof that testimony isn't true. It certainly is a pattern one will find in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
There is nothing in your church that you can show --which separated out the NT church from all others, IE--the heavenly manifestations, the canonized scriptures which recorded the heavenly manifestations, the priesthood, the temple, etc.---which your church is a man-made church manifested without those things----with the name of a man.
That you can point your finger and accuse does nothing to separate you from the traditional Jews of the NT--accusing the NT church of the same accusations you bring against His church today.
