CalvinismThat is for sure . More dogma talking instead of the Bible .
CalvinismThat is for sure . More dogma talking instead of the Bible .
My logic is sound, your objection to it is irrelevant. The God of the Bible is omniscient and possesses exhaustive foreknowledge of all things. ?No, I am demonstrating the failure of logic in your statements, Howie. Nonexistent beings do not have existent guilt to be punished for.
Doug
so he elects according to foreknowledge ?My logic is sound, your objection to it is irrelevant. The God of the Bible is omniscient and possesses exhaustive foreknowledge of all things. ?
Yes.so he elects according to foreknowledge ?
1 Peter 1:2 (KJV)
2 Elect according to the foreknowledge of God the Father, through sanctification of the Spirit, unto obedience and sprinkling of the blood of Jesus Christ: Grace unto you, and peace, be multiplied.
OKYes.
For those whom He FOREKNEW, He also predestined to become conformed to the image of His Son, so that He would be the firstborn among many brothers and sisters; and these whom He predestined, He also called; and these whom He called, He also justified; and these whom He justified, He also glorified. ... Rom 8:29-30.
It's the Biblical view, my view; it is also the Calvinist view. Prior to the foundation of the world, God intimately knew and loved those elected to salvation.OK
But you so know that is the Arminian view not the Calvinist view
The Calvinist view is based on unconditional electionIt's the Biblical view, my view; it is also the Calvinist view. Prior to the foundation of the world, God intimately knew and loved those elected to salvation.
Correct. God foreknowing those He saves isn't based on their actions. It is based on God setting His love upon them according to the kind intentions of His will.The Calvinist view is based on unconditional election
OK
But you do know that is the Arminian view not the Calvinist view
You're wrong.no the concept does not exist in the bible
Predestination concerns the destiny of the elect
Ephesians 1:4-5 (KJV)
4 According as he hath chosen us in him before the foundation of the world, that we should be holy and without blame before him in love:
5 Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children by Jesus Christ to himself, according to the good pleasure of his will,
election referring to God's choice
We are not saved nor come to faith by our own merit. God calls whom he will to his Salvation.But unconditional election to salvation is not
1 Corinthians 1:21 (KJV)
21 For after that in the wisdom of God the world by wisdom knew not God, it pleased God by the foolishness of preaching to save them that believe.
In the New Testament predestination is synonymous with Salvation.Yes in Calvinism it is synonymous with predestination
You need read the Bible before debating those who do .Try again
i am not trying to prove something from silence but to show the phrase does not exist in scripture
and if you read the verse predestination concerns the elect
The elect are predestined to adoption
no one is predestined to election
Yes, it is.No it’s not have you heard of the Calvinist doctrine of double predestination?
I've gotten to the point I only speak to him from time-to-time when I think he will participate well, or when I think it could benefit the Lurkers...You're wrong.
It would be folly to try to convince you of that fact when God's words fail to do so first.
But you are arguing that "He was chosen to receive the penalty due to him for his sin", meaning that Election to perdition is based on the condition of guilt.
Calvinism teaches they are predestined for hell in the same way the elect are for heaven .
Im not sure why I need to remind Calvinists what Calvin believed .
I'm sure you wouldn't have to when speaking to Calvinists.In double predestination the wicked are not predestined to salvation yet Calvinism teaches they are predestined for hell in the same way the elect are for heaven .
Im not sure why I need to remind Calvinists what Calvin believed .
True except predestination is never used of the wicked like Calvin taught . That was my point.
I don’t respond to the other poster as I’ve quoted Calvin many times teaching double predestination but he continues to ack like I have not so I do not play his cat and mouse games . Thank you .
I don’t respond to the other poster as I’ve quoted Calvin many times teaching double predestination
but he continues to ack like I have not so I do not play his cat and mouse games . Thank you .