Waiting for what? Have you forgotten what we are even discussing? YOU claimed that Judas is an unbeliever, that he wasnt drawn, etc. I asked for scriptural proof of that, you admitted there was none, and continue to argue an ASSUMPTION that you base on what the bible says about him. The son of destruction, it would have been better if he were never born, satan entered him, he betrayed Jesus.......everything. I simply asked if those reasons for your ASSUMPTION could be applied elsewhere, like Peter for example. The bible says some pretty bad things about Peter, but you consider him a "genuine believer" despite that. That makes your ASSUMPTION is arbitrary and inconsistent. Why is Peter a believer but not Judas?
And this is your favorite tactic. Once you are backed in a corner, you just repeat the same evasive questions, this is the third time for this particular one. If we cannot agree on the extent of satans involvement in Matt 16:23, who cares, that is not really the point. The point is that YOU mentioned in your ASSUMPTION about Judas and satan. Well satan is mentioned with Peter as well, so...? You keep ignoring that, and we both know why. According to your ASSUMPTION about Judas, Peter would then be an unbeliever as well. Own it.