No normal people call what you are hinting at feelings based woke ideologynormal people call what you are hinting at hate speech
No normal people call what you are hinting at feelings based woke ideologynormal people call what you are hinting at hate speech
No, the question was what did he say that broke the rules? I dont see it either except Twitter doesn't like the truth about biological sex.Remember when pride was a sin? And [Elliot] Page just had [his] breasts removed by a criminal physician.”
Not sure what it means but Twitter didn't like it.
You absolutely have no understanding of free speech. The government is who we are protected against with free speech. Twitter CARM Facebook etc do NOT owe you free speech. The company you or relatives have worked for do NOT offer you free speech.If free speech isnt free speech, what is it and why is it called free speech?
Free speech is free speech, a government can limit it but a government cant make free speech not free speech.
I answered the question. I posted what the guy said. Twitter said it is a violation you say it's not. Well it's Twitter's platform so they get to decide. I could care less.No, the question was what did he say that broke the rules? I dont see it either except Twitter doesn't like the truth about biological sex.
So, you can’t tell how/where he actually broke any rule?Remember when pride was a sin? And [Elliot] Page just had [his] breasts removed by a criminal physician.”
Not sure what it means but Twitter didn't like it.
Do you think I represent Twitter?So, you can’t tell how/where he actually broke any rule?
No. I’m making a point that Twitter rules are too ambiguous and are being used arbitrarily and in a discriminatory fashion.Do you think I represent Twitter?
I can't argue against that. Unless I saw a backstory on his quote I really don't get it. Perhaps I'm just dense?No. I’m making a point that Twitter rules are too ambiguous and are being used arbitrarily and in a discriminatory fashion.
I would argue, Peterson’s didn’t actually break any rule, but Twitter did.
Then it must depends what you mean by free, and now you seem to be more talking about who allows amounts of free speech.You absolutely have no understanding of free speech. The government is who we are protected against with free speech. Twitter CARM Facebook etc do NOT owe you free speech. The company you or relatives have worked for do NOT offer you free speech.
Spot on ?No. I’m making a point that Twitter rules are too ambiguous and are being used arbitrarily and in a discriminatory fashion.
I would argue, Peterson’s didn’t actually break any rule, but Twitter did.
Leaves you outnormal people call what you are hinting at hate speech
you might want to think about it moreLike Peterson and many here I still have absolutely no idea why his post resulted in suspension nor any reason.
Liberal society these days in not very polite.you might want to think about it more
Polite society doesn’t tolerate hate speech.
Peterson was merely stating facts. Your idea of polite society is mentally retarded and you definitely need to think about that.you might want to think about it more
Polite society doesn’t tolerate hate speech.
I see Bruce on Fox every now and then, what a mess!Bruce Jennder is crowned the New Miss Gender.
There's no such thing as hate speech. Just speech liberals don't like because it disagrees with them and their worldviewsyou might want to think about it more
Polite society doesn’t tolerate hate speech.
SJWs are not normal peoplenormal people call what you are hinting at hate speech
America is a constitutional societyyou might want to think about it more
Polite society doesn’t tolerate hate speech.