Bradshaw was wrong, since dozens of quires are identical 8-leaf quires.
Consistent, against his false claim.
And this is not an argument against Athos production, and that idea was disparaged by Scrivener-Miller.
Dirk Jongkind
However, I did not have the full count till the quotes posted yesterday.
So your fake mind-reading is discarded as typical contra posturing.
Here you can see how Alexandrinus was seen as having variable quires in 22 spots.
A Study of the Gospels in Codex Alexandrinus: Codicology, Palaeography, and Scribal Hands (2014)
William Andrew Smith
https://books.google.com/books?id=pWHPBAAAQBAJ&pg=PA89
View attachment 4616
So obviously
the Sinaiticus arrangement is far more akin to Bezae than Alexandrinus. Alexandrinus is a complex mess.
The Bradshaw quote remains wrong on both elements.
Note that nobody has tried to justify the Bradshaw palaeographical argument against the Athos production of Sinaiticus at any time in the next 160 years.
And note that Bradshaw gave no actual real, solid arguments.
What we have is all "intuition" and a fake, deceptive, fraudulent codicology claim.
We can also conclude that it was unlikely that he saw any 1844 CFA leaves in the vicinity of the darker, stained 1859 pages.
Worthless.
Bradshaw
https://books.google.com/books?id=j-u5AAAAIAAJ&pg=PA95