What? You are accusing me of being a Tritheist because you think three persons who are God makes three Gods.
I have no thoughts about three persons who are god because the scripture does not say anything about three persons being God.
The assertion three persons who are God makes three Gods is an assumption.
You are the one who asserts three persons make one God I simply disagree with you. Three individual persons each called God are three Gods in any language.
That Scripture doesn't say this makes it an assumption. Why can't three persons be the same God?
because each individual person is an individual God. You write it at every turn...God the father , God the son, and God the HS. three individual Gods.Each not the other.
That Scripture does not say it doesn't give you the right to assume we are Tritheists.
So if the scripture does not say it, where did you get that teaching from?
BTW, you are not just saying Scripture doesn't teach the Trinity.
Show me where the scripture says God is a trinity.
You are accusing us of believing in three Gods.
You do, you believe in God the father , God the son and God the Hs, each not the other...
That's an assumption. That Scripture doesn't say this makes it an assumption.
I am not assuming you wrote it in your post that The father is God , the son is God and the HS is God. They are not each other are they? then they are three individual Gods
Jesus broke the Sabbath without sinning because he is the Lord of the Sabbath.
That makes no sense... You are saying Jesus sinned without sinning...That seems like an excuse for you to sin and claim sin without sinning.
Besides, John said Jesus "not only had broken the sabbath, but said also that God was his Father, making himself equal with God." That's Scripture. That you don't believe it shows your rejection of the God of Scripture.
That is a denial that God is Jesus' father. Are you saying that God is not Jesus' Father?
No, that's called logic. That you reject one verse in light of another is a sign of anti-christ. If one verse says they are equal and another says they are not equal, then the Father and the Son must be equal in one way and not in another. Wow, that exactly what Trinitarians believe.
That is a gross misunderstanding on your part... The Jews were claiming that Jesus broke the sabbath and was claiming to be equal with God because he said God was his father.
If your lamb fell in a ditch and broke its leg on the sabbath will you leave it there? If your son must be circumcised on the eighth day after birth and that day is the sabbath will you circumcise or not? If your wife is giving birth on the sabbath and the midwife refuses to work on the sabbath and your wife has complications, and she and the baby die, who do you blame? If someone comes to rob you on the sabbath will you defend your property or will you let them take it all?
I did not claim Jesus sinned. There you go bearing false witness again. BTW, David likewise broke the Sabbath without sinning:
One Sabbath he was going through the grain fields, and as they made their way, his disciples began to pluck heads of grain. And the Pharisees were saying to him, “Look, why are they doing what is not lawful on the Sabbath?” And he said to them, “Have you never read what David did, when he was in need and was hungry, he and those who were with him: how he entered the house of God, in the time of Abiathar the high priest, and ate the bread of the Presence, which it is not lawful for any but the priests to eat, and also gave it to those who were with him?” And he said to them, “The Sabbath was made for man, not man for the Sabbath. So the Son of Man is lord even of the Sabbath.” Mark 2:23-28
But you said John wrote Jesus broke the sabbath. Now you are equating Jesus with David...Breaking the Sabbath is a sin there is no such thing as sinning without sinning. It is either they broke it or they did not break it.
Is your Jesus Lord of the Sabbath, or just a man?
Both since you would agree David must also be the Lord of the sabbath if he is not guilty for eating shewbread on the sabbath.
It doesn't mention three Gods. I said the Father is the only true God, the Son is the only true God and the Spirit is the only true God.
Three true gods since they are not each other.
The only logical way to read such is that the Father, Son and Spirit are the same God.
That is not logical since they are not each other.
Why do you keep on assuming three persons who are God means three Gods?
God Bless
Because you call each of them God and they are not each other...