They will never attribute any death to the stab.What evidence would one need to prove vaccines were killing people?
Or is it something that is just impossible to prove?
Asking for a friend ?
What would be considered “proof” as opposed to evidence? Ie. How can it be proven?There is evidence, but it's not proof. There are spikes in the non-Covid death rates, for each age group, shortly after the time of the staggered vaccinations for those age groups.
There can be evidence that you were in the area where a murder took place, like you dropped your wallet, but that's not proof you killed the person. Finding you standing over the dead body with the gun that killed the person is both evidence and proofWhat would be considered “proof” as opposed to evidence? Ie. How can it be proven?
I'm not sure that it can be proved, at least, not with current technology.What would be considered “proof” as opposed to evidence? Ie. How can it be proven?
Science does not deal in proof. Science accumulates data, and reaches conclusions that are consistent with that data.What would be considered “proof” as opposed to evidence? Ie. How can it be proven?
So its interpretation. Thanks. Again I love agreement.Science does not deal in proof. Science accumulates data, and reaches conclusions that are consistent with that data.
The changed and sick platelets can be seen under microscope.There is evidence, but it's not proof. There are spikes in the non-Covid death rates, for each age group, shortly after the time of the staggered vaccinations for those age groups.
Didn't someone say, when trump was president, that it has never taken less than 5 years to make a vaccine and they would never take a vaccine under a trump presidency but now love the thing so much they want to force it on others.The changed and sick platelets can be seen under microscope.
Thrombosis and thrombocytopenia, as well as many coagulation disorders, have been well documented.
Scientific conclusions can be used to create new hypotheses. Testing those hypotheses can produce new data that further confirms the original conclusion. This is how science works.So its interpretation. Thanks. Again I love agreement.
Science advances quickly. Things we did in the lab in the past that took months now take days.Didn't someone say, when trump was president, that it has never taken less than 5 years to make a vaccine and they would never take a vaccine under a trump presidency but now love the thing so much they want to force it on others.
So when trump was president it was "slow" science but once he left office it became "fast" science.Science advances quickly. Things we did in the lab in the past that took months now take days.
I think that has more to do with the “science” of “behavioral psychology.” You know, mind control, conditioning, hypnosis? Things like that.Didn't someone say, when trump was president, that it has never taken less than 5 years to make a vaccine and they would never take a vaccine under a trump presidency but now love the thing so much they want to force it on others.
So could there ever be enough evidence to conclude the vaccines are killing people? Or does evidence only work in the affirmative… when concluding the vaccines are safe and effective?Science does not deal in proof. Science accumulates data, and reaches conclusions that are consistent with that data.
The first vaccine was approved while Trump was still in office.So when trump was president it was "slow" science but once he left office it became "fast" science.
And cackling Harris said she didn't trust any vaccine developed under trump. It's amazing how suddenly the left loved the vaccine after not trusting it. You dont attention do you?The first vaccine was approved while Trump was still in office.
The quick pace of vaccine development was evident throughout Trump's last year.
You don't own nor speak for science, that is silly.Scientific conclusions can be used to create new hypotheses. Testing those hypotheses can produce new data that further confirms the original conclusion. This is how science works.
I assume you took a science class or two in high school where they explained what science is and how it works.
Given that science-based products work, we can conclude that science works.