Alison Wonderland
Member
I don’t know where the belief in Limited atonement came from but it certainly didn’t come from Calvin. Calvin believed in infant baptismal REGENERATION which is actually universal salvation, not election or limited atonement. So using Calvin’s name to describe election and limited atonement is a misnomer. Here’s what he said in His Institutes Bk. 4:Chapter 16 section 2:
"Scripture shows, first, that it points to that cleansing from sin which we obtain by the blood of Christ; and, secondly, to the mortification of the flesh, which consists in participation in his death, by which believers are regenerated to newness of life, and thereby to the fellowship of Christ…it is also a symbol to testify our religion to men."
Calvin’s contradictions:
1)He said that believers are regenerated to the newness of life.” Infants aren’t believers since they don’t even know who Jesus is.
2) Calvin said that he was converted between 1532-1533. Converted from what? Being regenerated when he was baptized as an infant?
3)Since Calvin said that infant baptism was of divine origin, then he supported baptizing ALL infants, which contradicts his claim that God only chose few to be saved. Thus, his belief in infant baptism is actually universal salvation rather than limited atonement and election since he said that people are regenerated at infant baptism.
4) It is well-known that Calvin believed and practiced infant baptism (as he says in this article as well) which contradicts his whole theology if he, infact, did believe in election and limited atonement, and is one of the reasons that he supported the murder of Servetus who didn’t support infant baptism.
"Scripture shows, first, that it points to that cleansing from sin which we obtain by the blood of Christ; and, secondly, to the mortification of the flesh, which consists in participation in his death, by which believers are regenerated to newness of life, and thereby to the fellowship of Christ…it is also a symbol to testify our religion to men."
Calvin’s contradictions:
1)He said that believers are regenerated to the newness of life.” Infants aren’t believers since they don’t even know who Jesus is.
2) Calvin said that he was converted between 1532-1533. Converted from what? Being regenerated when he was baptized as an infant?
3)Since Calvin said that infant baptism was of divine origin, then he supported baptizing ALL infants, which contradicts his claim that God only chose few to be saved. Thus, his belief in infant baptism is actually universal salvation rather than limited atonement and election since he said that people are regenerated at infant baptism.
4) It is well-known that Calvin believed and practiced infant baptism (as he says in this article as well) which contradicts his whole theology if he, infact, did believe in election and limited atonement, and is one of the reasons that he supported the murder of Servetus who didn’t support infant baptism.