Well your demonstrated knowledge of scripture has been shown to be minimal.I left one church and joined another denomination, where I am an active member.
Well your demonstrated knowledge of scripture has been shown to be minimal.I left one church and joined another denomination, where I am an active member.
Copy and paste where I brought up YOUR religion. You can't get something this basic right but we are supposed to think you know what you're saying?I left one church and joined another denomination, where I am an active member.
Yeah we get in some kind of loopAnother canned robotic response.
TrueHer view of the world is very cartoonish.
Well, we fixed the law about black people, who are still not treated equally in our society.Blacks at one time also weren't persons under the law.
I care about actual people and actual babies. You only care about women. You're not the kind of person I want anywhere near public policy
So rapists should be granted visitation or custody?We have courts to determine that, and to grant men either visitation or custody or whatever.
You have demonstrated your lack of perception.Well, we fixed the law about black people, who are still not treated equally in our society.
I do not see the RW anti-abortion movement as caring about anything but fetuses. They have opposed all programs to provide healthcare to pregnant women and young families, school lunches, paid maternity leave, affordable childcare, etc. If you can point to the programs your side has supported, that would be appreciated.
OTOH, I do not see your side even mentioning the trauma of desperate women faced with crisis pregnancies.
My view of public policy on this issue:
--mandated medically accurate sex ed that includes how to avoid unintended pregnancies
--cost-free access to the most effective forms of BC for all women
--easy access to first trimester pregnancies at low to no cost
--prenatal and postnatal care for all women
--nutritional assistance for children in poor families
--paid maternity/paternity leave
--testing for fetal defects and abortions for serious defects whenever they are detected
--abortions for health issues that arise during or before pregnancy and threaten the life or health of the mother
So go ahead and list your positions on these same issues.
No you cannot, as I am an active member of a Lutheran church.But now we can call you an atheist.
I can question your intelligence since you have asked that questionSo rapists should be granted visitation or custody?
post 78No I didn't. Copy and paste where I did
As Christ says not everyone who belongs to a church will get into heavenNo you cannot, as I am an active member of a Lutheran church.
I gather you do not belong to a church, right?
Not sure I understand your point.No, you totally blame the murderer! 100%. It's the murderer's fault, and the murderer's fault alone for murdering someone.
So why would you blame ANYONE or ANYTHING else besides the murderer? Like....a law that doesn't force or compel ANYONE to actually murder anyone else?
There was a feminist college professor about 30 years ago, thst said all sex was rape. Now we know who your teacher was.No you cannot, as I am an active member of a Lutheran church.
I gather you do not belong to a church, right?
You are confusing the number of dead women with the entire sample size examined.I wouldn't put money on it.
This is a purely emotional argument. When I pointed out that they generalized to the whole population the experience of 273 women who were pregnant or were pregnant within the previous year she accused me of not caring about the dead women. What scientist, as she claims, to be would generalize with such a small sample? When I asked about how many died from the covid vaccine she didn't seem to concerned about those deaths. This is nothing but emotion.
So you are saying women lack decernment, that women are dumb.Not sure I understand your point.
There are plenty of posts on this thread blaming the dead women for not carefully choosing their boyfriends/husbands.
Nope.In order to be pro-choice, we've seen the following arguments in the pro-choice camp:
- The fetus isn't human.
- We can't even reasonably determine whether it is a living thing.
- It is nothing more than a parasite.
- You're making women into inert incubators and nothing more.
- This is only about wanting control over women's bodies.
- Babies will be born into difficult circumstances and so it's better to abort them (i.e., kill them).
The arguments are very very emotional and not scientific in nature at all - that is, they deny basic science that we all learn in school. And then twist themselves in knots making up scenarios and arguments that just leave one shaking your head.
Prove it. Please don't say something as nonsensical nas "It's obvious"Well, we fixed the law about black people, who are still not treated equally in our society.
You made a claim you back it up.I do not see the RW anti-abortion movement as caring about anything but fetuses. They have opposed all programs to provide healthcare to pregnant women and young families, school lunches, paid maternity leave, affordable childcare, etc. If you can point to the programs your side has supported, that would be appreciated.
There's a crisis pregnancy center down the street from my house. Oops.OTOH, I do not see your side even mentioning the trauma of desperate women faced with crisis pregnancies.
Including keeping your legs closed and pants zipped?My view of public policy on this issue:
--mandated medically accurate sex ed that includes how to avoid unintended pregnancies.
Never. If its not important enough for the woman or man to pay for why should I? Please don't bore me with the cost to society nonsense.--cost-free access to the most effective forms of BC for all women.
Again not free. Nothing is.--easy access to first trimester pregnancies at low to no cost.
That they pay for? Yes.--prenatal and postnatal care for all women.
Define "poor"--nutritional assistance for children in poor families.
How long?--paid maternity/paternity leave.
That they pay for. They should get more accurate tests. 85% error rate is not acceptable--testing for fetal defects and abortions for serious defects whenever they are detected.
I have already said yes to this--abortions for health issues that arise during or before pregnancy and threaten the life or health of the mother.
Just didSo go ahead and list your positions on these same issues.
Sorry, but claiming victimhood for hypothetical generations in the future is just odd.Clutching your pearls does nothing to buttress your support of infanticide. Concerning cases of domestic abuse, to include spousal murder, I am a survivor of spousal abuse from my first wife so domestic abuse is not only men on women but also women on men, to include murder.
Who Kills Whom in Spouse Killings? On the Exceptional Sex Ratio of Spousal Homicides in the United States | Office of Justice Programs
www.ojp.gov
Women are not guiltless victims when aborting their unborn child. The unborn child is being denied the right, repeat the right, to life by their mother. But not just that unborn child but their children and their children's children, ad infinitum.
Very good. Was I talking you in that post? Did I refer to you in the post?post 78
I ask AGAIN, what's the same size and how many of the dead women were pregnant vs post pregnancy when killed?You are confusing the number of dead women with the entire sample size examined.