brotherofJared
Well-known member
Only if they actually follow the shepherd.Sheep follow the Shepherd.
Only if they actually follow the shepherd.Sheep follow the Shepherd.
Sure. They may have witnessed the works of the Holy Spirit, may have even been used by the Holy Spirit. The passage isn't really clear.
From the faith.
The same way the dog returns to his vomit. If a sow is washed, is it clean on the inside? Or just externally? I've helped my dad and my uncles butcher hogs, and I've dressed many feral hogs, but I can't say that I've ever washed a sow. But I'm pretty sure washing a sow only cleans the sow on the outside.
Sure. It means somebody who just says the words vs somebody who exercises true, saving faith.
Describing what sanctification looks like is not the same as saying works are necessary for sanctification.So clearly, if you feel this man represents the Bible and Christianity, it appears as if Christianity believes along with Mormonism that "Works are necessary to obtain the 'status' of being "sanctified." I will admit, I really liked as was reminded of the distinction on position with Christ being unchanged after we are saved.
So, you think the Mormon leaders I cited do not know what Mormonism teaches? The Mormon sources I quoted were written by "spiritual infants"?Unfortunately, I believe there's a lot of misinformation about Mormonism because many leave the church when they are spiritual infants (as spoken about in Part 1), and the people that leave think they are mature on the merits of how long they were members
The men I quoted were not "ex-Mormons", but revered Mormon leaders. The sources I quoted are still in use in Mormonism today.As the sermon states, these things are not what determines spiritual maturity. So, when I say ex-mormons don't understand the restored gospel the way I do, this is what I'm referring to.
Describing what sanctification looks like is not the same as saying works are necessary for sanctification.
He very clearly states numerous times that sanctification is the RESULT of salvation, not a means of salvation.
How is a tree fruitful without fruit?Describing what sanctification looks like is not the same as saying works are necessary for sanctification.
Sure. Ok.He very clearly states numerous times that sanctification is the RESULT of salvation, not a means of salvation.
How so?Once again, you're caught in a lie.
No, I think you understood the quotes incorrectly - confusing exaltation (sanctification) with salvation (justification).So, you think the Mormon leaders I cited do not know what Mormonism teaches? The Mormon sources I quoted were written by "spiritual infants"?
Yes. And you misunderstood them.The men I quoted were not "ex-Mormons", but revered Mormon leaders. The sources I quoted are still in use in Mormonism today.
Are you really asking this question?Is God's grace necessary for salvation to occur?
Aaron32 said:No, I think you understood the quotes incorrectly - confusing exaltation (sanctification) with salvation (justification).
Aaron32 said:Yes. And you misunderstood them.
Ok. Well, clarification has been made. Using the quotes going forward, you can make note that according to mormonism, obedience doesn't contribute to their salvation, but to their exaltation.Once again, I did NOT confuse salvation and exaltation. It is YOU who never made any kind of distinction between salvation and exaltation,
I was referring to our motive. We obey BECAUSE we LOVE God - whatever status or position occurs is a natural consequence.but simply said "works are a RESULT because of our love for God, not to earn a status or position". I have quoted your own words many times, saying "status or position", not "salvation or exaltation".
Yes. And whatever meaning you pulled out of them I illustrated from your own source that you also believe in the same general concepts:I quoted them verbatim.
Don't tell me. Tell these guys:according to mormonism, obedience doesn't contribute to their salvation
That's an argument to be had between you and the Mormon sources I cited.I was referring to our motive. We obey BECAUSE we LOVE God - whatever status or position occurs is a natural consequence.
Likewise, according to your own source works are also necessary to have the status of "sanctified".
Yet again, you lie. We do not believe that works are necessary to become sanctified or achieve spiritual growth.Yes. And whatever meaning you pulled out of them I illustrated from your own source that you also believe in the same general concepts:
- Yes, works are necessary to become sanctified and achieve spiritual growth.
Please try to start telling the truth, if you can.This is my clarified statement. Please stick to and refute these points if you can.
Yes, if you contradict Mormon sources, then I am going to cite Mormon sources to clarify what Mormonism teaches. If you don't like that, then maybe you ought to go back to your cult leaders and ask them to teach you to be a better apologist for Mormonism.If you ignore this and desire to beat me over the head with previous talking points then you're the one with the honesty problem, not me.
The laws and ordinances of the gospel of repentance are: faith, repentance, baptism, and the gift of the holy Ghost by laying on of hands.Don't tell me. Tell these guys:
The LDS Third Article of Faith states: "We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel" (Pearl of Great Price: Articles of Faith)."
Yes. Do you believe you can be saved without receiving Jesus Christ?This clearly says that obedience to laws is required for salvation.
Whereas, you believe you do not need to obey the gospel to be saved?James Talmage says: "...redemption from personal sins can only be obtained through obedience to the requirement of the Gospel, and a life of good works" (James Talmage, in A Study of the Articles of Faith).
Miracle of Forgiveness is no longer in print. It is not doctrine.Spencer W. Kimball states: "living all the commandments guarantees total forgiveness of sins and assures one of exaltation...trying is not sufficient. Nor is repentence when one merely tries to abandon sin" (The Miracle of Forgiveness, p.164-165, 354-355).
What's the alternative? Do you believe you can be saved by not following Jesus Christ?Bruce McConkie claimed: "Jesus kept the commandments of his Father and thereby worked out his own salvation, and also set an example as to the way and the means whereby all men may be saved" (The Mortal Messiah, Vol.4, p.434).
Yes. And also not that your quotes are referring to the Law of the Gospel.And before you dishonestly accuse me of not knowing the difference between Mormon salvation and exaltation again, please note that each of these quotes plainly refers to SALVATION, not exaltation. Think you can understand that?
Ok. And you are not an authority. That makes you neither right nor wrong.That's an argument to be had between you and the Mormon sources I cited.
Then you disown the source you cited?Yet again, you lie. We do not believe that works are necessary to become sanctified or achieve spiritual growth.
That's irrelevant. Salvation precedes exaltation. So what?To the contrary, I even explained to you in a previous post that sanctification is the result of salvation, not the result of works.
Please stop ad homing me and stick to the topic if you can.Please try to start telling the truth, if you can.
No, I haven't. Only in your skewed interpretation.Yes, if you contradict Mormon sources,
By all means do. Also don't forget the quote above to place all your stated quotes in context.then I am going to cite Mormon sources to clarify what Mormonism teaches.
I have no problem with it.If you don't like that,
Personal insults...is this the fruit of a Christian, or a work of the flesh?then maybe you ought to go back to your cult leaders and ask them to teach you to be a better apologist for Mormonism.
No, nothing at all in the Bible suggests we receive Cjrist by the gift of the Holy Ghost by laying on of hands or following the law. The Bible is very clear that we receive Christ by faith, not by works and not by rituals.The laws and ordinances of the gospel of repentance are: faith, repentance, baptism, and the gift of the holy Ghost by laying on of hands.
The laws are what's required to receive Jesus Christ as our Savior and Lord.
The ordinances are outward expressions of that.
Having faith and repentance to receive Jesus Christ is biblical. The ordinances demostrated are also biblical.
Non sequitur. We're not talking about receiving Jesus Christ, but performing works to earn salvation .Yes. Do you believe you can be saved without receiving Jesus Christ?
Sure. I just believe we're to follow the Bible's Gospel, not your trash cult's gospel.Whereas, you believe you do not need to obey the gospel to be saved?
So, can you tell us when Spencer W. Kimball became unable to accurately represent Mormon doctrine.Miracle of Forgiveness is no longer in print. It is not doctrine.
The alternative is salvation by grace through faith, like the Bible says.What's the alternative?
Do you think acting like a fool is going to attract people to Mormonism?Do you believe you can be saved by not following Jesus Christ?
Wjat part of "by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel" are you too feeble minded to understand?Yes. And also not that your quotes are referring to the Law of the Gospel.
That's why I cited Mormon authorities to show you that you're wrong.Ok. And you are not an authority. That makes you neither right nor wrong.
Then you should have posted those verses, rather than just making declarations that were easily refuuted.I have the scriptures to justify my beliefs and place the quotes in context.
Not at all. Just pointing out that you continue to lie.Then you disown the source you cited?
Irrelevant. You asked specifically about salvation.That's irrelevant. Salvation precedes exaltation. So what?
Then stop lying, putting words in my mouth, and playing bait and switch.Please stop ad homing me and stick to the topic if you can.
Actually, I didn't offer a interpretation. I quoted them verbatim.No, I haven't. Only in your skewed interpretation.
I did. Several times, in fact.By all means do. Also don't forget the quote above to place all your stated quotes in context.
Is your constant lying the fruit of a Mormon?I have
Personal insults...is this the fruit of a Christian, or a work of the flesh?
Can you rise above your lying? Can you rise above putting words in my mouth? Can you rise above the dishonest debate tactics?You can rise above this behavior Mike.
It's sad that you have no problem lying to defend your cult.It's sad that a so-called "cult follower" needs to point this out to you.
True, but works are an expression of faith.No, nothing at all in the Bible suggests we receive Cjrist by the gift of the Holy Ghost by laying on of hands or following the law. The Bible is very clear that we receive Christ by faith, not by works and not by rituals.
The question of "How do we appropriately witness we receive Jesus Christ?" seems to be relevant to me.Non sequitur. We're not talking about receiving Jesus Christ, but performing works to earn salvation .
So where in the Bible is baptism or the laying of hands considered forbidden?Sure. I just believe we're to follow the Bible's Gospel, not your trash cult's gospel.
When he stopped aligning with the scriptures.So, can you tell us when Spencer W. Kimball became unable to accurately represent Mormon doctrine.
So Jesus "set an example as to the way" is not "grace through faith"The alternative is salvation by grace through faith, like the Bible says.
No. How is this relevant?Do you think acting like a fool is going to attract people to Mormonism?
I could ask you the same question. What am I not understanding?What part of "by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the Gospel" are you too feeble minded to understand?
And you failed to do so.That's why I cited Mormon authorities to show you that you're wrong.
What declarations of mine do you find unscriptural? I'll be happy to get the scriptural backing.Then you should have posted those verses, rather than just making declarations that were easily refuted.
But you've yet to prove that.Not at all. Just pointing out that you continue to lie.
Huh?Irrelevant. You asked specifically about salvation.
Just stick to the topic. If I'm playing bait-and-switch please illustrate it rather than attack my character.Then stop lying, putting words in my mouth, and playing bait and switch.
Then what are we arguing about?Actually, I didn't offer a interpretation. I quoted them verbatim.
I and expect you will in the future.I did. Several times, in fact.
Can you prove that I'm lying outside your opinion?Is your constant lying the fruit of a Mormon?
Dude! It's really simple. Just stay on topic.Can you rise above your lying? Can you rise above putting words in my mouth? Can you rise above the dishonest debate tactics?
If you think I'm lying, prove it, and I'll address it.It's sad that you have no problem lying to defend your cult.
If this is what you believe, then you should have avoided the conversation to begin with.I've had enough. You're precisely the kind of fool Proverbs 26:4 talks about. You're dismissed. Continue on your way to Hell
This question can be asked about every Mormon leader whose teachings have since been relegated to “not doctrine,” starting with Joseph Smith. And that’s a very large number of so-called prophets.So, can you tell us when Spencer W. Kimball became unable to accurately represent Mormon doctrine.
Yet again, you lie. We do not believe that works are necessary to become sanctified or achieve spiritual growth.
To the contrary, I even explained to you in a previous post that sanctification is the result of salvation, not the result of works.
This view is based on the false premise that we are 'a cult' - checking out brains at the door, and blindly accepting what our 'cult leaders' tell us.This question can be asked about every Mormon leader whose teachings have since been relegated to “not doctrine,” starting with Joseph Smith. And that’s a very large number of so-called prophets.
God doesn’t give His prophets false doctrine or false prophecies. The fact that Mormons have to scrounge thru what their leaders have taught and figure out what’s even their own doctrine, is a sign that they are false prophets Christ warned us about.
Don't tell me. Tell these guys:
The LDS Third Article of Faith states: "We believe that through the Atonement of Christ, all mankind may be saved, by obedience to the laws and ordinances of the gospel" (Pearl of Great Price: Articles of Faith)."
This clearly says that obedience to laws is required for salvation.
God doesn’t give His prophets false doctrine or false prophecies.
How is that "false"?Does that include this Prophet?
Matthew 19:16-19---King James Version
16 And, behold, one came and said unto him, Good Master, what good thing shall I do, that I may have eternal life?
17 And he said unto him, Why callest thou me good? there is none good but one, that is, God: but if thou wilt enter into life, keep the commandments.
18 He saith unto him, Which? Jesus said, Thou shalt do no murder, Thou shalt not commit adultery, Thou shalt not steal, Thou shalt not bear false witness,
19 Honour thy father and thy mother: and, Thou shalt love thy neighbour as thyself.
Could you please explain why you believe the Mormon sources and authorities I've quoted are wrong? They all believe works are required, not grace.Just a note here, Mike---the LDS believe both sanctification and salvation is a result of God's grace.
Of course. But I believe the Bible's teaching that the cleansing from sin is free and without any obligation or effort on our part.Do you believe being cleansed from sin is integral to salvation and sanctification?