Yep it is the pagan practices that the RCC has syncretized into the truth and means it is a lie. The bread and wine do not change otherwise those evil priests would be dropping down dead or very sick.cannibalistic interpretation would be the Romans of His day due to their lack of understanding
Since the accidents remain, there is no cannibalism
- Jesus would not break the commandment or insist his followers do so. Even in the NT it is forbidden to drink blood.
- Jesus was at a meal that was symbolic.
- If it was real blood he would have cut his wrist and got real blood.
- If it was real, those evil priest would be dropping dead like flies after they were prayed with insect repellant.
- Jesus calls it the fruit of the vine, not my blood see Mark 14:24 “This is my blood of the covenant, which is poured out for many,” he said to them. 25 “Truly I tell you, I will not drink again from the fruit of the vine until that day when I drink it new in the kingdom of God.
- Jesus had not yet shed his blood, that happens on the cross.
- Paul is clear it is a memorial. 1 Cor 11: 2 This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me When Jesus said the apostles are salt or that they were lights, he was speaking symbolically. Matt 5:13+
- It is clear that Jesus was not saying to the apostles they were salt or a light in a literal sense: “You are the salt of the earth. But if the salt loses its saltiness, how can it be made salty again? It is no longer good for anything, except to be thrown out and trampled underfoot. “You are the light of the world. A town built on a hill cannot be hidden
- Jesus says he is a door, this is also not a literal door. Jesus says Peter is satan.
- Hmm if the meal is important and the both the bread and wine are literal, why oh why for years was the priest the only one to drink the wine.
- John 16:25 “Though I have been speaking figuratively, a time is coming when I will no longer use this kind of language but will tell you plainly about my Father. This shows He has been speaking figuratively for some time.
- Luke says it is commenorative. Luke 22:19 "And he took bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it and gave it to them, saying, “This is my body, which is given for you. Do this in remembrance of me.”
- Bread is very symbolic in scripture it can be used for belief or as in the case of yeast it can represent sin.
- Symbolic language is used throughout the whole of scripture. In the OT and the NT.
- If you say Jesus using I am the bread is literal, then all the other I am verses must be interpreted the same way literal. This is a problem as Jesus says I am the door, I am light, I am the vine etc.